Suppr超能文献

作为心源性休克患者过渡到左心室辅助装置策略的临时循环支持的结果

Outcome of Temporary Circulatory Support As a Bridge-to-Left Ventricular Assist Device Strategy in Cardiogenic Shock Patients.

作者信息

Bidaut Auriane, Flécher Erwan, Nesseler Nicolas, Bounader Karl, Vincentelli André, Moussa Mouhammed, Delmas Clément, Porterie Jean, Nubret Karine, Pernot Mathieu, Kindo Michel, Schneider Clément, Gaudard Philippe, Rouvière Philippe, Michel Magali, Sénage Thomas, Boignard Aude, Chavanon Olivier, Verdonk Constance, Para Marylou, Maille Baptiste, Gariboldi Vlad, Pozzi Matteo, Hugon-Vallet Elisabeth, Litzler Pierre-Yves, Anselme Frédéric, Blanchart Katrien, Babatasi Gerard, Bielefeld Marie, Grosjean Sandrine, Radu Costin, Hamon David, Bourguignon Thierry, Genet Thibaud, Eschalier Romain, D'Ostrevy Nicolas, Nougue Hélène, Martin Anne Cécile, Vanhuyse Fabrice, Blangy Hugues, Leclercq Christophe, Martins Raphael P, Galand Vincent

机构信息

Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, Rennes, France.

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM, CNRS, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2022 May 1;50(5):e426-e433. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005424. Epub 2022 Jan 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Temporary circulatory support (TCS) as a bridge-to-left ventricular assist device (BTL) in cardiogenic shock patients has been increasing, but limited data exists on this BTL strategy. We aimed at analyzing the outcome of BTL patients in a population of cardiogenic shock patients compared with those without TCS at the time of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery and identify predictors of postoperative mortality in this specific population.

DESIGN

A multicenter retrospective observational study conducted in 19 centers from 2006 to 2016.

SETTING

Nineteen French centers.

PATIENTS

A total of 329 cardiogenic shock patients at the time of LVAD implantation were analyzed. Patients were divided in three groups: those under TCS at the time of LVAD implantation (n = 173), those with TCS removal before LVAD surgery (n = 24), and those who did not undergo a bridging strategy (n = 152). Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among the BTL group, 68 (39.3%), 18 (10.4%), and 15 (8.7%) patients were under venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Impella, and IABP support alone, and 72 patients (20.6%) were under multiple TCS support. BTL patients presented similar 30 days survival compared with the TCS removal and non-BTL groups. However, BTL group had a significantly longer ICU duration stay, with two-fold duration of mechanical ventilation time, but the three groups experienced similar postoperative complications. Multivariate analysis identified three independent predictors of mortality in the BTL group: combined surgery with LVAD, body mass index (BMI), and heart failure (HF) duration. BTL strategy was not an independent predictor of mortality in cardiogenic shock patients who underwent LVAD.

CONCLUSIONS

BTL strategy is not associated with a lower survival among cardiogenic shock patients with LVAD implantation. Predictors of mortality are combined surgery with LVAD, higher BMI, and HF duration.

摘要

目的

作为心源性休克患者过渡到左心室辅助装置(BTL)的临时循环支持(TCS)应用日益增多,但关于这种BTL策略的数据有限。我们旨在分析心源性休克患者群体中BTL患者在左心室辅助装置(LVAD)手术时与未接受TCS患者相比的结局,并确定这一特定人群术后死亡的预测因素。

设计

2006年至2016年在19个中心进行的多中心回顾性观察研究。

地点

19个法国中心。

患者

共分析了329例LVAD植入时的心源性休克患者。患者分为三组:LVAD植入时接受TCS的患者(n = 173)、LVAD手术前移除TCS的患者(n = 24)以及未采用过渡策略的患者(n = 152)。主要终点为30天死亡率。

干预措施

无。

测量指标及主要结果

在BTL组中,分别有68例(39.3%)、18例(10.4%)和15例(8.7%)患者仅接受静脉 - 动脉体外膜肺氧合、Impella和主动脉内球囊反搏支持,72例患者(20.6%)接受多种TCS支持。与TCS移除组和非BTL组相比,BTL组患者的30天生存率相似。然而,BTL组的重症监护病房住院时间显著更长,机械通气时间延长两倍,但三组术后并发症相似。多因素分析确定了BTL组死亡的三个独立预测因素:与LVAD联合手术、体重指数(BMI)和心力衰竭(HF)持续时间。BTL策略不是接受LVAD的心源性休克患者死亡的独立预测因素。

结论

BTL策略与植入LVAD的心源性休克患者较低的生存率无关。死亡预测因素为与LVAD联合手术、较高的BMI和HF持续时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验