Suppr超能文献

分子风险分类器评分和生化复发风险与 Gleason 评分 3+4=7 前列腺癌的筛状模式类型相关。

Molecular risk classifier score and biochemical recurrence risk are associated with cribriform pattern type in Gleason 3+4=7 prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Department of Pathology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Investig Clin Urol. 2022 Jan;63(1):27-33. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210262.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Among Gleason pattern 4 types, cribriform pattern is associated with the worst outcomes. We hypothesized that larger cribriform patterns would be associated with increased Decipher scores and higher biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk in Gleason 3+4=7 prostatectomy patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The slide from patients who underwent prostatectomy from January 2016 to March 2020 on which Decipher was performed was re-reviewed for Gleason score and cribriform patterns, with large cribriform defined as cribriform acini with greater than 12 lumens and simple cribriform as 12 or fewer lumens. Differences in Decipher score were analyzed in a generalized linear model controlling for pathology stage and tumor margin status. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was performed for BCR-free survival.

RESULTS

Of 337 cases, 118 were Gleason 3+4=7. The mean Decipher scores in 3+4=7 cases without cribriform, with simple cribriform, and with large cribriform were 0.41, 0.54, and 0.62, respectively. In a multivariable model with pathology stage, margin tumor length, and percentage pattern 4 as covariates, compared to cases without cribriform, simple cribriform was associated with 0.10 increase in Decipher (p=0.03) and 4.7-fold hazard ratio of BCR (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-56.5; p=0.22) and large cribriform was associated with 0.17 increase in Decipher (p<0.001) and 16.0-fold hazard ratio of BCR (95% CI, 1.4-181.2; p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Among Gleason 3+4=7 carcinomas, large cribriform was associated with higher Decipher scores and greater BCR risk. Our results support that large cribriform is an aggressive pattern 4 subtype and should be considered a contraindication for active surveillance.

摘要

目的

在 Gleason 4 型中,筛状型与最差的预后相关。我们假设较大的筛状模式与增加的 Decipher 评分和更高的生化复发(BCR)风险相关在 Gleason 3+4=7 前列腺切除术患者中。

材料和方法

对 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月期间接受前列腺切除术且进行了 Decipher 检测的患者的切片进行了 Gleason 评分和筛状模式的重新评估,其中大筛状定义为有超过 12 个腔的筛状腺,而简单筛状为 12 个或更少的腔。通过控制病理分期和肿瘤边缘状态的广义线性模型分析 Decipher 评分的差异。对于无筛状、单纯筛状和大筛状的 3+4=7 病例,多变量 Cox 比例风险模型用于无 BCR 生存。

结果

在 337 例病例中,有 118 例为 Gleason 3+4=7。在无筛状、单纯筛状和大筛状的 3+4=7 病例中,Decipher 评分的平均值分别为 0.41、0.54 和 0.62。在一个多变量模型中,病理分期、边缘肿瘤长度和 4 型模式百分比作为协变量,与无筛状病例相比,单纯筛状与 Decipher 评分增加 0.10(p=0.03)和 BCR 的 4.7 倍风险比(95%置信区间[CI],0.4-56.5;p=0.22)相关,大筛状与 Decipher 评分增加 0.17(p<0.001)和 BCR 的 16.0 倍风险比(95%CI,1.4-181.2;p=0.02)相关。

结论

在 Gleason 3+4=7 癌中,大筛状与更高的 Decipher 评分和更大的 BCR 风险相关。我们的结果支持大筛状是一种侵袭性 4 型亚型,应被视为主动监测的禁忌症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76ca/8756156/7dca8a08aaac/icu-63-27-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验