Suppr超能文献

执法人员穿着的战术背心:这是否提高了稳定性,从而实现最佳工作表现?

Tactical vests worn by law enforcement: is this improving stability for optimal job performance?

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology & Exercise Science, College of Saint Mary, USA.

Department of Educational Foundations, Auburn University, USA.

出版信息

Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2023 Mar;29(1):177-180. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2021.2024993. Epub 2022 Feb 10.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether equipped tactical vests would improve postural stability of law enforcement officers (LEOs) versus a duty belt or without either condition. Volunteers were police officers ( = 25, 22 males, three females; age 42.4 ± 3.2 years; weight 101.65 ± 19.4 kg; height 178.92 ± 8.2 cm). The Institutional Review Board approved the investigation. A Bertec posturography plate (Bertec Inc., USA) determined four center of pressure (CoP) scores - eyes open stable surface (EOSS), eyes closed stable surface (ECSS), eyes open perturbed surface (EOPS), eyes closed perturbed surface (ECPS) - and four limit of stability (LoS) scores - frontal plane (LoSF), posterior plane (LoSP), left sagittal plane (LoSL), right sagittal plane (LoSR). . A repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) demonstrated no statistical difference within subject group CoP scores EOSS ( = 0.723), ECSS ( = 0.252), EOPS ( = 0.079) and ECPS ( = 0.137). Comparing between groups, the tactical vest demonstrated significance over the other CoP group conditions with ECPS ( = 0.001). The duty belt group showed significance with ECSS ( = 0.001). LoS variables indicated no significant results between groups. Tactical vests demonstrated improvements in ECPS scores ( = 0.001) compared to either group.

摘要

本研究旨在确定装备战术背心是否能比配带勤务腰带或不配带任何装备更能提高执法人员的姿势稳定性。志愿者为警察( = 25 人,22 名男性,3 名女性;年龄 42.4 ± 3.2 岁;体重 101.65 ± 19.4 公斤;身高 178.92 ± 8.2 厘米)。机构审查委员会批准了该调查。贝泰克足底压力测试板(贝泰克公司,美国)确定了四个中心压力(CoP)评分——睁眼稳定表面(EOSS)、闭眼稳定表面(ECSS)、睁眼受扰表面(EOPS)、闭眼受扰表面(ECPS)——和四个稳定性极限(LoS)评分——额状面(LoSF)、后状面(LoSP)、左矢状面(LoSL)、右矢状面(LoSR)。. 重复测量多元方差分析(MANOVA)表明,在 EOSS( = 0.723)、ECSS( = 0.252)、EOPS( = 0.079)和 ECPS( = 0.137)等 CoP 组内受试者评分中,无统计学差异。在组间比较中,战术背心在 ECPS( = 0.001)方面优于其他 CoP 组条件。勤务腰带组在 ECSS( = 0.001)方面表现出显著差异。LoS 变量在组间没有显示出显著的结果。与任何其他组相比,战术背心在 ECPS 评分方面都有显著提高( = 0.001)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验