Hou Haihai, Zhang Huajie, Shao Longyi, Guo Shuangqing, Zhao Ming'en, Wang Shuai
Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China.
China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China.
ACS Omega. 2021 Dec 13;6(51):35523-35537. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c05012. eCollection 2021 Dec 28.
Coal macrolithotypes are closely correlated with coal macerals and pore-fracture structures, which greatly influence the changes in gas content and the coal structure. Traditional macrolithotype identification in coalbed methane (CBM) wells mostly depends on core drilling observation, which is expensive, time-consuming, and difficult for broken core extraction. Geophysical logging is a quick and effective method to address this issue. We obtained coal cores from 75 wells in the deep regions of the Jiaozuo Coalfield, northern China, quantitatively analyzed the logging cutoff number corresponding to various macrolithotypes, and established natural γ (GR), deep lateral resistivity (LLD), and γ-γ log (GGL) response rules for each coal macrolithotype. The formation mechanisms of different coal macrolithotypes are discussed from the perspective of coal facies and pore structures. The results show that GGL decreased but GR and LLD increased from bright coal to dull coal. Most coal macrolithotypes can be distinguished based on the established thresholds of various logging curves. However, excessively high or low ash yields significantly affect the validity of identification. The vertical coal macrolithotypes attributed to the peat marsh environment in Shanxi Formation mostly comprise three to six sublayers; dull or semi-dull coals are predominant close to the 2 coal seam, and the bright or semi-bright types usually appear in the middle part. The semi-bright and bright coals are usually vitrinite rich, whereas the semi-dull and dull coals are primarily inertinite rich. For pore structure arguments, the highest average specific surface area ( ) and the total pore volume ( ) are found in bright coals, followed by dull and semi-bright coals; those of semi-dull coals are the lowest. However, and V change significantly for different samples, even though the coal macrolithotype is the same. Therefore, the macrolithotype is not the key factor determining the coal parameters of pore structures. Rapid and effective identification of coal macrolithotypes can help determine the CBM enrichment area, the CBM well location, and the exploration horizon.
煤的宏观煤岩类型与煤岩组分及孔隙 - 裂隙结构密切相关,这对瓦斯含量变化和煤体结构有很大影响。煤层气(CBM)井中传统的宏观煤岩类型识别大多依赖于岩芯钻探观测,这种方法成本高、耗时,且破碎岩芯提取困难。地球物理测井是解决这一问题的快速有效方法。我们从中国北方焦作煤田深部的75口井获取了煤芯,定量分析了对应于各种宏观煤岩类型的测井截止值,并建立了每种煤宏观煤岩类型的自然伽马(GR)、深侧向电阻率(LLD)和伽马 - 伽马测井(GGL)响应规律。从煤相和孔隙结构的角度讨论了不同煤宏观煤岩类型的形成机制。结果表明,从亮煤到暗煤,GGL降低,而GR和LLD升高。基于建立的各种测井曲线阈值,大多数煤宏观煤岩类型可以被区分。然而,过高或过低的灰分产率会显著影响识别的有效性。山西组泥炭沼泽环境下的垂向煤宏观煤岩类型大多由三到六个亚层组成;靠近2号煤层主要是暗煤或半暗煤,亮煤或半亮煤通常出现在中部。半亮煤和亮煤通常富含镜质组,而半暗煤和暗煤主要富含惰质组。就孔隙结构而言,亮煤的平均比表面积( )和总孔隙体积( )最高,其次是暗煤和半亮煤;半暗煤的最低。然而,即使煤宏观煤岩类型相同,不同样品的 和V变化也很大。因此,宏观煤岩类型不是决定孔隙结构煤参数的关键因素。快速有效地识别煤宏观煤岩类型有助于确定煤层气富集区、煤层气井位置和勘探层位。