Suppr超能文献

支气管扩张症的间歇性预防性抗生素治疗。

Intermittent prophylactic antibiotics for bronchiectasis.

机构信息

Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.

Medical Sciences, Institute of Health, University of Cumbria, Lancaster, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 5;1(1):CD013254. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013254.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bronchiectasis is a common but under-diagnosed chronic disorder characterised by permanent dilation of the airways arising from a cycle of recurrent infection and inflammation. Symptoms including chronic, persistent cough and productive phlegm are a significant burden for people with bronchiectasis, and the main aim of treatment is to reduce exacerbation frequency and improve quality of life. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy aims to break this infection cycle and is recommended by clinical guidelines for adults with three or more exacerbations a year, based on limited evidence. It is important to weigh the evidence for bacterial suppression against the prevention of antibiotic resistance and further evidence is required on the safety and efficacy of different regimens of intermittently administered antibiotic treatments for people with bronchiectasis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intermittent prophylactic antibiotics in the treatment of adults and children with bronchiectasis.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified trials from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, which contains studies identified through multiple electronic searches and handsearches of other sources. We also searched trial registries and reference lists of primary studies. We conducted searches on 6 September 2021, with no restriction on language of publication.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of at least three months' duration comparing an intermittent regime of prophylactic antibiotics with placebo, usual care or an alternate intermittent regimen. Intermittent prophylactic administration was defined as repeated courses of antibiotics with on-treatment and off-treatment intervals of at least 14 days' duration. We included adults and children with a clinical diagnosis of bronchiectasis confirmed by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT), plain film chest radiograph, or bronchography and a documented history of recurrent chest infections. We excluded studies where participants received high dose antibiotics immediately prior to enrolment or those with a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), primary ciliary dyskinesia, hypogammaglobulinaemia, sarcoidosis, or a primary diagnosis of COPD. Our primary outcomes were exacerbation frequency and serious adverse events. We did not exclude studies on the basis of review outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We analysed dichotomous data as odds ratios (ORs) or relative risk (RRs) and continuous data as mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs). We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We conducted GRADE assessments for the following primary outcomes: exacerbation frequency; serious adverse events and secondary outcomes: antibiotic resistance; hospital admissions; health-related quality of life.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight RCTs, with interventions ranging from 16 to 48 weeks, involving 2180 adults. All evaluated one of three types of antibiotics over two to six cycles of 28 days on/off treatment: aminoglycosides, ß-lactams or fluoroquinolones. Two studies also included 12 cycles of 14 days on/off treatment with fluoroquinolones. Participants had a mean age of 63.6 years, 65% were women and approximately 85% Caucasian. Baseline FEV ranged from 55.5% to 62.6% predicted. None of the studies included children. Generally, there was a low risk of bias in the included studies. Antibiotic versus placebo: cycle of 14 days on/off. Ciprofloxacin reduced the frequency of exacerbations compared to placebo (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.93; I = 65%; 2 studies, 469 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), with eight people (95% CI 6 to 28) needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome. The intervention increased the risk of antibiotic resistance more than twofold (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.35; I = 0%; 2 studies, 624 participants; high-certainty evidence). Serious adverse events, lung function (FEV), health-related quality of life, and adverse effects did not differ between groups. Antibiotic versus placebo: cycle of 28 days on/off. Antibiotics did not reduce overall exacerbation frequency (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.02; I = 0%; 8 studies, 1695 participants; high-certainty evidence) but there were fewer severe exacerbations (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.93; I = 54%; 3 studies, 624 participants), though this should be interpreted with caution due to low event rates. The risk of antibiotic resistance was more than twofold higher based on a pooled analysis (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.42 to 3.42; I = 0%; 3 studies, 685 participants; high-certainty evidence) and consistent with unpooled data from four further studies. Serious adverse events, time to first exacerbation, duration of exacerbation, respiratory-related hospital admissions, lung function, health-related quality of life and adverse effects did not differ between study groups. Antibiotic versus usual care. We did not find any studies that compared intermittent antibiotic regimens with usual care. Cycle of 14 days on/off versus cycle of 28 days on/off. Exacerbation frequency did not differ between the two treatment regimens (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.24; I = 71%; 2 studies, 625 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) However, inconsistencies in the results from the two trials in this comparison indicate that the apparent aggregated similarities may not be reliable. There was no evidence of a difference in antibiotic resistance between groups (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.48; I = 60%; 2 studies, 624 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Serious adverse events, adverse effects, lung function and health-related quality of life did not differ between the two antibiotic regimens.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Overall, in adults who have frequent chest infections, long-term antibiotics given at 14-day on/off intervals slightly reduces the frequency of those infections and increases antibiotic resistance. Intermittent antibiotic regimens result in little to no difference in serious adverse events. The impact of intermittent antibiotic therapy on children with bronchiectasis is unknown due to an absence of evidence, and further research is needed to establish the potential risks and benefits.

摘要

背景

支气管扩张症是一种常见但诊断不足的慢性疾病,其特征是气道反复感染和炎症导致气道永久性扩张。包括慢性、持续咳嗽和多痰在内的症状是支气管扩张症患者的沉重负担,治疗的主要目标是减少恶化频率并提高生活质量。预防性抗生素治疗旨在打破这种感染循环,并基于有限的证据,被临床指南推荐用于每年有三次或以上恶化的成人。重要的是要权衡细菌抑制的证据与预防抗生素耐药性的证据,并且需要更多关于不同方案的间歇性给予抗生素治疗对支气管扩张症患者的安全性和疗效的证据。

目的

评估间歇性预防性抗生素治疗成人和儿童支气管扩张症的安全性和疗效。

检索方法

我们从 Cochrane Airways 试验登记处确定了试验,该登记处包含通过多次电子搜索和其他来源的手工搜索确定的研究。我们还检索了试验注册处和主要研究的参考文献列表。我们于 2021 年 9 月 6 日进行了检索,对发表语言没有限制。

选择标准

我们纳入了持续至少三个月的随机对照试验(RCT),比较了间歇性预防性抗生素与安慰剂、常规护理或替代间歇性方案。间歇性预防性给药定义为重复疗程的抗生素,治疗期和停药期至少为 14 天。我们纳入了有临床诊断为支气管扩张症的成年人和儿童,通过高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)、胸片或支气管造影证实,并有反复胸部感染的病史。我们排除了那些在入组前立即接受高剂量抗生素治疗的参与者或那些患有囊性纤维化、变应性支气管肺曲霉菌病(ABPA)、原发性纤毛运动障碍、低丙种球蛋白血症、结节病或 COPD 主要诊断的参与者。我们的主要结局是恶化频率和严重不良事件。我们没有根据审查结果排除研究。

数据收集和分析

我们将二分类数据分析为比值比(ORs)或相对风险(RRs),将连续数据分析为均数差(MDs)或标准化均数差(SMDs)。我们使用了 Cochrane 预期的标准方法学程序。我们对以下主要结局进行了 GRADE 评估:恶化频率;严重不良事件和次要结局:抗生素耐药性;住院;健康相关生活质量。

主要结果

我们纳入了八项 RCT,干预措施持续 16 至 48 周,涉及 2180 名成年人。所有研究均评估了三种抗生素中的一种,在 28 天的治疗/停药周期中进行了 2 至 6 个周期:氨基糖苷类、β-内酰胺类或氟喹诺酮类。两项研究还包括 12 个周期的 14 天治疗/停药的氟喹诺酮类药物。参与者的平均年龄为 63.6 岁,65%为女性,约 85%为白种人。基线 FEV 占预计值的 55.5%至 62.6%。没有一项研究纳入儿童。一般来说,纳入的研究偏倚风险较低。抗生素与安慰剂:14 天的治疗/停药周期。环丙沙星与安慰剂相比,降低了恶化的频率(RR 0.75,95%CI 0.61 至 0.93;I = 65%;2 项研究,469 名参与者;中等确定性证据),需要额外的有益结果的人数为 8 人(95%CI 6 至 28)。该干预措施使抗生素耐药性的风险增加了两倍以上(OR 2.14,95%CI 1.36 至 3.35;I = 0%;2 项研究,624 名参与者;高确定性证据)。严重不良事件、肺功能(FEV)、健康相关生活质量和不良反应在两组之间没有差异。抗生素与安慰剂:28 天的治疗/停药周期。抗生素并没有降低总体恶化频率(RR 0.92,95%CI 0.82 至 1.02;I = 0%;8 项研究,1695 名参与者;高确定性证据),但严重恶化的次数较少(OR 0.59,95%CI 0.37 至 0.93;I = 54%;3 项研究,624 名参与者),但由于事件发生率低,应谨慎解释。基于汇总分析,抗生素耐药性的风险增加了两倍以上(OR 2.20,95%CI 1.42 至 3.42;I = 0%;3 项研究,685 名参与者;高确定性证据),并且与来自另外四项研究的未汇总数据一致。严重不良事件、首次恶化时间、恶化持续时间、呼吸道相关住院、肺功能、健康相关生活质量和不良反应在研究组之间没有差异。抗生素与常规护理。我们没有发现任何比较间歇性抗生素方案与常规护理的研究。14 天的治疗/停药周期与 28 天的治疗/停药周期。恶化频率在两种治疗方案之间没有差异(RR 1.02,95%CI 0.84 至 1.24;I = 71%;2 项研究,625 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。然而,这两项比较中两个试验的结果不一致表明,明显的聚集相似性可能不可靠。两组之间的抗生素耐药性没有差异(OR 1.00,95%CI 0.68 至 1.48;I = 60%;2 项研究,624 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。严重不良事件、不良反应、肺功能和健康相关生活质量在两种抗生素方案之间没有差异。

作者结论

总体而言,在经常发生肺部感染的成年人中,14 天的治疗/停药间隔的长期抗生素治疗可轻微降低感染频率,并增加抗生素耐药性。间歇性抗生素治疗方案对严重不良事件的影响很小。支气管扩张症儿童的间歇性抗生素治疗的影响尚不清楚,因为缺乏证据,需要进一步研究以确定潜在的风险和益处。

相似文献

1
Intermittent prophylactic antibiotics for bronchiectasis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 5;1(1):CD013254. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013254.pub2.
2
Macrolide antibiotics for bronchiectasis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 15;3(3):CD012406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012406.pub2.
3
Antibiotics for exacerbations of asthma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD002741. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002741.pub2.
4
Inhaled anti-pseudomonal antibiotics for long-term therapy in cystic fibrosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 14;11(11):CD001021. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001021.pub4.
5
Dual antibiotics for bronchiectasis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 11;6(6):CD012514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012514.pub2.
6
Immunostimulants versus placebo for preventing exacerbations in adults with chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 14;11(11):CD013343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013343.pub2.
7
Head-to-head trials of antibiotics for bronchiectasis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 5;9(9):CD012590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012590.pub2.
8
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub9.
9
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub3.
10
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub7.

引用本文的文献

1
Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs): A Review and Proposal for Clinicians.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Jan 2;14(1):22. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14010022.
2
Asthma and respiratory comorbidities.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2025 Feb;155(2):316-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.11.006. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
4
Monitoring disease progression in childhood bronchiectasis.
Front Pediatr. 2022 Sep 16;10:1010016. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1010016. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of TOBI Podhaler in infected bronchiectasis patients: iBEST study.
Eur Respir J. 2021 Jan 5;57(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01451-2020. Print 2021 Jan.
4
The biology of pulmonary exacerbations in bronchiectasis.
Eur Respir Rev. 2019 Nov 20;28(154). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0055-2019. Print 2019 Dec 31.
7
Airway Bacterial Load and Inhaled Antibiotic Response in Bronchiectasis.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Jul 1;200(1):33-41. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201809-1651OC.
10
Adverse events in people taking macrolide antibiotics versus placebo for any indication.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 18;1(1):CD011825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011825.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验