The School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.
The School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Clin Nutr. 2022 Feb;41(2):298-306. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.12.007. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The dietary management of active ulcerative colitis (UC) is currently poorly understood. Due to the lack of clinical guidelines for this population, diet choice may be based on the personal judgement of the clinician, and without sound evidence. The aim of this systematic review was to appraise the current literature on the dietary management of individuals with active UC, in both inpatient and outpatient settings, to determine if clinical outcomes differ by diet prescription.
PUBMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science and SCOPUS were comprehensively searched during March and April 2020. Eligible trials recruited adults with active UC comparing different methods of dietary management, including enteral nutrition (EN), total parenteral nutrition (TPN), elimination diets and standard oral diets, in both the inpatient and outpatient settings.
10 studies met inclusion criteria of this qualitative synthesis. No difference was found between EN, TPN and bowel rest in terms of disease activity measures when compared to a standard oral diet. The results of this study also showed promising potential for the use of elimination diets in the outpatient setting with four studies finding a significant difference in disease activity measures between the intervention diet and control.
There is no strong evidence to support the use of any specific dietary prescription to improve clinical outcomes for individuals with active UC. A number of low quality studies suggest benefit of following an elimination diet, however, additional high quality studies are required before any more specific recommendations can be made.
目前,人们对活动期溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的饮食管理知之甚少。由于缺乏针对这一人群的临床指南,饮食选择可能基于临床医生的个人判断,且缺乏可靠的证据。本系统评价的目的是评估目前关于活动期 UC 患者(包括住院和门诊患者)饮食管理的文献,以确定不同饮食方案的临床结局是否存在差异。
2020 年 3 月至 4 月,全面检索了 PUBMED、CINAHL、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 SCOPUS。纳入了比较不同饮食管理方法(包括肠内营养[EN]、全胃肠外营养[TPN]、排除饮食和标准口服饮食)在住院和门诊环境下治疗活动期 UC 的成年患者的试验。
本定性综合分析纳入了 10 项研究。与标准口服饮食相比,EN、TPN 和肠道休息在疾病活动指标方面与标准口服饮食相比无差异。本研究结果还表明,排除饮食在门诊环境中具有很大的应用潜力,其中 4 项研究发现干预饮食与对照饮食在疾病活动指标方面存在显著差异。
目前没有强有力的证据支持使用任何特定的饮食方案来改善活动期 UC 患者的临床结局。一些低质量的研究表明,遵循排除饮食有获益,然而,需要更多高质量的研究才能提出更具体的建议。