文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

需要口服抗凝药物的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者双联抗栓治疗的支架血栓形成风险:随机试验荟萃分析的见解。

The risk of stent thrombosis of dual antithrombotic therapy for patients who require oral anticoagulant undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: insights of a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shizuoka Medical Center, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Scand Cardiovasc J. 2022 Feb;56(1):1-3. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2021.2025264. Epub 2022 Jan 8.


DOI:10.1080/14017431.2021.2025264
PMID:35001785
Abstract

Recent meta-analyses investigating dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) versus triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) among patients who require oral anticoagulants especially with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) raised the concern of stent thrombosis (ST) and myocardial infarction (MI), however, these meta-analyses did not include all randomized trials who require oral anticoagulants. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of DAT versus TAT in these patients undergoing PCI. Our data showed the risk of ST was not significantly different in DAT vs. TAT (HR [95%CI]: 1.50 [0.97-2.34],  = .07; = 0%) and MI (HR [95%CI]: 1.17 [0.95-1.45],  = .14; = 0%).

摘要

最近的荟萃分析研究了需要口服抗凝剂的患者(尤其是伴有心房颤动 [AF] 的患者)中双联抗栓治疗(DAT)与三联抗栓治疗(TAT)的疗效,这些分析引起了人们对支架血栓形成(ST)和心肌梗死(MI)的关注,然而,这些荟萃分析并未纳入所有需要口服抗凝剂的随机试验。我们旨在研究这些接受 PCI 的患者中 DAT 与 TAT 的疗效。我们的数据显示,DAT 与 TAT 相比 ST 的风险无显著差异(HR [95%CI]:1.50 [0.97-2.34],  = .07; = 0%)和 MI(HR [95%CI]:1.17 [0.95-1.45],  = .14; = 0%)。

相似文献

[1]
The risk of stent thrombosis of dual antithrombotic therapy for patients who require oral anticoagulant undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: insights of a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Scand Cardiovasc J. 2022-2

[2]
Intracranial haemorrhages vs. stent thromboses with direct oral anticoagulant plus single antiplatelet agent or triple antithrombotic therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in atrial fibrillation and percutaneous coronary intervention/acute coronary syndrome patients.

Europace. 2020-4-1

[3]
Bleeding and ischaemic outcomes in patients treated with dual or triple antithrombotic therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2019-10-1

[4]
Risk of Stroke vs. Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Dual vs. Triple Antithrombotic Therapy.

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021-4

[5]
Safety and efficacy of double vs. triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation with or without acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a collaborative meta-analysis of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant-based randomized clinical trials.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2021-4-9

[6]
Double or triple antithrombotic therapy after coronary stenting and atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Int J Cardiol. 2019-12-28

[7]
Revisiting the effects of omitting aspirin in combined antithrombotic therapies for atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndromes or percutaneous coronary interventions: meta-analysis of pooled data from the PIONEER AF-PCI, RE-DUAL PCI, and AUGUSTUS trials.

Europace. 2020-1-1

[8]
Antithrombotic strategies in patients needing oral anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021-3

[9]
The optimal duration of triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Int J Cardiol. 2022-6-15

[10]
Efficacy and safety of single vs dual antiplatelet therapy in patients on anticoagulation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019-8-29

引用本文的文献

[1]
Comparative Safety of Anticoagulant, Antiplatelet and the Combination of Both for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Biomedicines. 2025-8-20

[2]
Enhanced Reendothelialization and Thrombosis Prevention with a New Drug-Eluting Stent.

Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024-6-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索