Naik Premal
Rainbow Superspeciality Hospital and Children's Orthopaedic Centre, Next To Asia School, Behind HDFC Bank, Opposite Drive in Cinema, Bodakdev, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380 054 India.
Smt S C L Hospital, NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat India.
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Dec 20;55(6):1605. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00502-6. eCollection 2021 Dec.
The most common approach for the open reduction of DDH is the anterolateral approach. After an initial report by Weinstein and Ponseti, the medial approach for DDH has garnered great interest.
The medial approach for DDH allows easy access to the structures which block the reduction of the femoral head into the acetabulum; namely the psoas tendon, inferior capsule, and ligamentum teres. It uses a skin crease small incision in the groin with excellent cosmetic outcome and is very well hidden.
The classical medial approach described by Ludloff uses interval between the adductor brevis and pectineus. The anteromedial approach to the hip uses the same incision but interval between the pectineus and femoral neurovascular bundle and allows better handling of medial circumflex vessels. A technical modification suggested by Late Ian Torode involves tenodesis of the ligamentum teres which improves the stability of the hip reduction. This video demonstrates the medial approach for the open reduction of DDH in a fourteen months old girl with medium-term follow-up results. The technique of the tenodesis of ligamentum teres is also shown.
The medial approach is safe with a low rate of re-dislocation; it does not violate the hip abductors and iliac apophysis. The major disadvantage of the medial approach is the restricted operative field and a higher rate of AVN. Many authors have found the rate of AVN comparable to other approaches and the grade of AVN milder culminating in good long-term results.
We have found this approach very useful in children with DDH, before they start walking (when the closed reduction is unstable) and arthrogrypotic children with hip dislocation.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00502-6.
发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)切开复位最常用的方法是前外侧入路。在温斯坦和庞塞蒂首次报告后,DDH的内侧入路引起了极大关注。
DDH的内侧入路便于接近阻碍股骨头复位至髋臼的结构,即腰大肌腱、下关节囊和圆韧带。它在腹股沟处采用沿皮纹的小切口,美容效果极佳且隐藏性很好。
路德洛夫描述的经典内侧入路利用短收肌和耻骨肌之间的间隙。髋关节的前内侧入路使用相同的切口,但利用耻骨肌和股神经血管束之间的间隙,能更好地处理旋股内侧血管。伊恩·托罗德后期提出的一项技术改进涉及圆韧带的腱固定,可提高髋关节复位的稳定性。本视频展示了一名14个月大女童DDH切开复位的内侧入路及中期随访结果。还展示了圆韧带腱固定技术。
内侧入路安全,再脱位率低;不侵犯髋外展肌和髂骨骨骺。内侧入路的主要缺点是手术视野受限和股骨头缺血性坏死(AVN)发生率较高。许多作者发现AVN发生率与其他入路相当,且AVN程度较轻,最终长期效果良好。
我们发现这种入路对DDH患儿(在开始行走前,闭合复位不稳定时)以及髋关节脱位的关节挛缩患儿非常有用。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s43465-021-00502-6获取的补充材料。