Seraphim Andreas, Knott Kristopher D, Augusto Joao B, Menacho Katia, Tyebally Sara, Dowsing Benjamin, Bhattacharyya Sanjeev, Menezes Leon J, Jones Daniel A, Uppal Rakesh, Moon James C, Manisty Charlotte
Department of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Health National Health System Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 23;8:795195. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.795195. eCollection 2021.
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery effectively relieves symptoms and improves outcomes. However, patients undergoing CABG surgery typically have advanced coronary atherosclerotic disease and remain at high risk for symptom recurrence and adverse events. Functional non-invasive testing for ischaemia is commonly used as a gatekeeper for invasive coronary and graft angiography, and for guiding subsequent revascularisation decisions. However, performing and interpreting non-invasive ischaemia testing in patients post CABG is challenging, irrespective of the imaging modality used. Multiple factors including advanced multi-vessel native vessel disease, variability in coronary hemodynamics post-surgery, differences in graft lengths and vasomotor properties, and complex myocardial scar morphology are only some of the pathophysiological mechanisms that complicate ischaemia evaluation in this patient population. Systematic assessment of the impact of these challenges in relation to each imaging modality may help optimize diagnostic test selection by incorporating clinical information and individual patient characteristics. At the same time, recent technological advances in cardiac imaging including improvements in image quality, wider availability of quantitative techniques for measuring myocardial blood flow and the introduction of artificial intelligence-based approaches for image analysis offer the opportunity to re-evaluate the value of ischaemia testing, providing new insights into the pathophysiological processes that determine outcomes in this patient population.
冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)能有效缓解症状并改善预后。然而,接受CABG手术的患者通常患有晚期冠状动脉粥样硬化疾病,症状复发和不良事件的风险仍然很高。缺血性功能无创检测通常用作侵入性冠状动脉和移植血管造影的把关手段,并用于指导后续的血运重建决策。然而,无论使用何种成像方式,对CABG术后患者进行无创缺血检测并解读其结果都具有挑战性。包括晚期多支冠状动脉病变、术后冠状动脉血流动力学的变异性、移植血管长度和血管舒缩特性的差异以及复杂的心肌瘢痕形态等多种因素,只是使该患者群体缺血评估复杂化的部分病理生理机制。系统评估这些挑战对每种成像方式的影响,可能有助于通过结合临床信息和个体患者特征来优化诊断测试的选择。与此同时,心脏成像领域的最新技术进展,包括图像质量的提高、测量心肌血流的定量技术的更广泛应用以及基于人工智能的图像分析方法的引入,为重新评估缺血检测的价值提供了机会,从而为确定该患者群体预后的病理生理过程提供新的见解。