Suppr超能文献

美泊利珠单抗治疗伴有鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎:基于合并症和血嗜酸性粒细胞计数的治疗疗效。

Mepolizumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: Treatment efficacy by comorbidity and blood eosinophil count.

机构信息

Upper Airways Research Laboratory and Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Ghent University and Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Division of ENT Diseases, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institute, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden; First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, International Airway Research Center, Guangzhou, China.

Clinical Sciences, GSK R&D, Brentford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 May;149(5):1711-1721.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.10.040. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the phase III SYNAPSE study, mepolizumab reduced nasal polyp (NP) size and nasal obstruction in chronic rhinosinusitis with NP.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the efficacy of mepolizumab in patients from SYNAPSE grouped by comorbid asthma, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), and baseline blood eosinophil count (BEC).

METHODS

SYNAPSE, a randomized, double-blind, 52-week study (NCT03085797), included patients with severe bilateral chronic rhinosinusitis with NP eligible for surgery despite intranasal corticosteroid treatment. Patients received 4-weekly subcutaneous mepolizumab 100 mg or placebo plus standard of care for 52 weeks. Coprimary end points were change in total endoscopic NP score (week 52) and nasal obstruction visual analog scale score (weeks 49-52). Subgroup analyses by comorbid asthma and AERD status, and post hoc by BEC, were exploratory.

RESULTS

Analyses included 407 patients (289 with asthma; 108 with AERD; 371 and 278 with BEC counts ≥150 or ≥300 cells/μL, respectively). The proportion of patients with greater than or equal to 1-point improvement from baseline in NP score was higher with mepolizumab versus placebo across comorbid diseases (asthma: 52.9% vs 29.5%; AERD: 51.1% vs 20.6%) and baseline BEC subgroups (<150 cells/μL: 55.0% vs 31.3%; ≥150 cells/μL: 49.5% vs 28.1%; <300 cells/μL: 50.7% vs 29.0%; ≥300 cells/μL: 50.4% vs 28.1%). A similar trend was observed in patients without comorbid asthma or AERD. More patients had more than 3-point improvement in nasal obstruction VAS score with mepolizumab versus placebo across comorbid subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Mepolizumab reduced polyp size and nasal obstruction in chronic rhinosinusitis with NP regardless of the presence of comorbid asthma or AERD.

摘要

背景

在 III 期 SYNAPSE 研究中,美泊利珠单抗可缩小慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)患者的鼻息肉(NP)大小并减轻鼻阻塞。

目的

我们旨在评估 SYNAPSE 研究中伴有合并哮喘、阿司匹林加重的呼吸道疾病(AERD)和基线血嗜酸性粒细胞计数(BEC)的患者接受美泊利珠单抗治疗的疗效。

方法

SYNAPSE 是一项随机、双盲、52 周的研究(NCT03085797),纳入了尽管接受了鼻内皮质类固醇治疗但仍适合手术的严重双侧慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴 NP 的患者。患者接受 4 周一次的皮下美泊利珠单抗 100mg 或安慰剂联合标准治疗 52 周。主要终点为第 52 周总内镜 NP 评分(NPSS)和第 49-52 周时的鼻阻塞视觉模拟量表评分(VAS)的变化。根据合并哮喘和 AERD 状态进行亚组分析,并根据 BEC 进行事后分析。

结果

分析包括 407 例患者(289 例合并哮喘;108 例合并 AERD;371 例和 278 例 BEC 计数分别≥150 或≥300 个/μL)。与安慰剂相比,美泊利珠单抗在合并疾病(哮喘:52.9% vs 29.5%;AERD:51.1% vs 20.6%)和基线 BEC 亚组(<150 个/μL:55.0% vs 31.3%;≥150 个/μL:49.5% vs 28.1%;<300 个/μL:50.7% vs 29.0%;≥300 个/μL:50.4% vs 28.1%)中,NP 评分改善≥1 分的患者比例更高。在没有合并哮喘或 AERD 的患者中也观察到了类似的趋势。与安慰剂相比,更多的患者接受美泊利珠单抗治疗后,鼻阻塞 VAS 评分改善超过 3 分。

结论

美泊利珠单抗可缩小慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴 NP 患者的鼻息肉大小和减轻鼻阻塞,无论是否存在合并哮喘或 AERD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验