• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习方法在预测机器人增量金属板材成形力中的对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force.

机构信息

Institute of Mechatronics, Kaunas University of Technology, 51424 Kaunas, Lithuania.

Department of Applied Informatics, Kaunas University of Technology, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 21;22(1):18. doi: 10.3390/s22010018.

DOI:10.3390/s22010018
PMID:35009560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8747513/
Abstract

This paper proposes a method for extracting information from the parameters of a single point incremental forming (SPIF) process. The measurement of the forming force using this technology helps to avoid failures, identify optimal processes, and to implement routine control. Since forming forces are also dependent on the friction between the tool and the sheet metal, an innovative solution has been proposed to actively control the friction forces by modulating the vibrations that replace the environmentally unfriendly lubrication of contact surfaces. This study focuses on the influence of mechanical properties, process parameters and sheet thickness on the maximum forming force. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and different machine learning (ML) algorithms have been applied to develop an efficient force prediction model. The predicted forces agreed reasonably well with the experimental results. Assuming that the variability of each input function is characterized by a normal distribution, sampling data were generated. The applicability of the models in an industrial environment is due to their relatively high performance and the ability to balance model bias and variance. The results indicate that ANN and Gaussian process regression (GPR) have been identified as the most efficient methods for developing forming force prediction models.

摘要

本文提出了一种从单点增量成形(SPIF)工艺参数中提取信息的方法。使用这项技术测量成形力有助于避免故障、识别最佳工艺,并实现常规控制。由于成形力还取决于工具和金属板之间的摩擦,因此提出了一种创新的解决方案,通过调节振动来主动控制摩擦力,从而取代对环境不友好的接触表面润滑。本研究重点研究了机械性能、工艺参数和板厚对最大成形力的影响。人工神经网络(ANN)和不同的机器学习(ML)算法已被应用于开发有效的力预测模型。预测力与实验结果相当吻合。假设每个输入函数的可变性都由正态分布来描述,生成了采样数据。由于其较高的性能和平衡模型偏差和方差的能力,这些模型在工业环境中的适用性得以保证。结果表明,ANN 和高斯过程回归(GPR)已被确定为开发成形力预测模型的最有效方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/e6b6b7b3a11d/sensors-22-00018-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/2163d1c18cd7/sensors-22-00018-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/45cccc572d44/sensors-22-00018-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/e11b27a3d05e/sensors-22-00018-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/2c849daf8045/sensors-22-00018-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/15714f99d6c4/sensors-22-00018-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/475cfcfb671f/sensors-22-00018-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/340bb886f112/sensors-22-00018-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/a9aacfe621af/sensors-22-00018-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/fa41892f4885/sensors-22-00018-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/df026b949a3a/sensors-22-00018-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/26cb52ed347c/sensors-22-00018-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/bc50d7dd4074/sensors-22-00018-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/ba7d8903a05e/sensors-22-00018-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/127700b69a24/sensors-22-00018-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/3973f31d03a0/sensors-22-00018-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/1584cc32f884/sensors-22-00018-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/da134d531141/sensors-22-00018-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/5cf4e07b6c07/sensors-22-00018-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/e9999f6ca22c/sensors-22-00018-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/968d6717acc7/sensors-22-00018-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/e6b6b7b3a11d/sensors-22-00018-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/2163d1c18cd7/sensors-22-00018-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/45cccc572d44/sensors-22-00018-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/e11b27a3d05e/sensors-22-00018-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/2c849daf8045/sensors-22-00018-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/15714f99d6c4/sensors-22-00018-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/475cfcfb671f/sensors-22-00018-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/340bb886f112/sensors-22-00018-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/a9aacfe621af/sensors-22-00018-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/fa41892f4885/sensors-22-00018-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/df026b949a3a/sensors-22-00018-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/26cb52ed347c/sensors-22-00018-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/bc50d7dd4074/sensors-22-00018-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/ba7d8903a05e/sensors-22-00018-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/127700b69a24/sensors-22-00018-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/3973f31d03a0/sensors-22-00018-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/1584cc32f884/sensors-22-00018-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/da134d531141/sensors-22-00018-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/5cf4e07b6c07/sensors-22-00018-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/e9999f6ca22c/sensors-22-00018-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/968d6717acc7/sensors-22-00018-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86b7/8747513/e6b6b7b3a11d/sensors-22-00018-g021.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Robotized Incremental Metal Sheet Forming Force.机器学习方法在预测机器人增量金属板材成形力中的对比分析
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 21;22(1):18. doi: 10.3390/s22010018.
2
Prediction of formation force during single-point incremental sheet metal forming using artificial intelligence techniques.使用人工智能技术预测单点渐进成形过程中的成形力。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 22;14(8):e0221341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221341. eCollection 2019.
3
Investigation of the Robotized Incremental Metal-Sheet Forming Process with Ultrasonic Excitation.超声激励下的机器人化渐进式金属板材成型工艺研究。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jan 28;15(3):1024. doi: 10.3390/ma15031024.
4
Investigation of Advanced Robotized Polymer Sheet Incremental Forming Process.先进机器人化聚合物板材渐进成形工艺研究
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Nov 10;21(22):7459. doi: 10.3390/s21227459.
5
Thermo-Mechanical Numerical Simulation of Friction Stir Rotation-Assisted Single Point Incremental Forming of Commercially Pure Titanium Sheets.工业纯钛板搅拌摩擦旋转辅助单点渐进成形的热-机械数值模拟
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jun 24;17(13):3095. doi: 10.3390/ma17133095.
6
Central Composite Design Optimisation in Single Point Incremental Forming of Truncated Cones from Commercially Pure Titanium Grade 2 Sheet Metals.基于商业纯钛2级薄板的截头圆锥单点渐进成形的中心复合设计优化
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 29;14(13):3634. doi: 10.3390/ma14133634.
7
Parametric Effects of Single Point Incremental Forming on Hardness of AA1100 Aluminium Alloy Sheets.单点渐进成形对AA1100铝合金板材硬度的参数影响
Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 27;14(23):7263. doi: 10.3390/ma14237263.
8
The Comparison of the Multi-Layer Artificial Neural Network Training Methods in Terms of the Predictive Quality of the Coefficient of Friction of 1.0338 (DC04) Steel Sheet.基于1.0338(DC04)钢板摩擦系数预测质量的多层人工神经网络训练方法比较
Materials (Basel). 2024 Feb 16;17(4):908. doi: 10.3390/ma17040908.
9
Enhancing/Improving Forming Limit Curve and Fracture Height Predictions in the Single-Point Incremental Forming of Al1050 Sheet Material.提高/改善Al1050板材单点增量成形中的成形极限曲线和断裂高度预测
Materials (Basel). 2023 Nov 21;16(23):7266. doi: 10.3390/ma16237266.
10
Study of Friction and Wear Effects in Aluminum Parts Manufactured via Single Point Incremental Forming Process Using Petroleum and Vegetable Oil-Based Lubricants.使用石油基和植物油基润滑剂通过单点增量成型工艺制造铝部件时的摩擦和磨损效应研究。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jul 16;14(14):3973. doi: 10.3390/ma14143973.

引用本文的文献

1
Control Strategy for Excipient Variability in the Quality by Design Approach Using Statistical Analysis and Predictive Model: Effect of Microcrystalline Cellulose Variability on Design Space.基于统计分析和预测模型的质量源于设计方法中辅料变异性的控制策略:微晶纤维素变异性对设计空间的影响
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Nov 8;14(11):2416. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14112416.

本文引用的文献

1
The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation.在回归分析评估中,决定系数R平方比对称平均绝对百分比误差(SMAPE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)、均方误差(MSE)和均方根误差(RMSE)更具信息量。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2021 Jul 5;7:e623. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.623. eCollection 2021.
2
Study of Friction and Wear Effects in Aluminum Parts Manufactured via Single Point Incremental Forming Process Using Petroleum and Vegetable Oil-Based Lubricants.使用石油基和植物油基润滑剂通过单点增量成型工艺制造铝部件时的摩擦和磨损效应研究。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jul 16;14(14):3973. doi: 10.3390/ma14143973.
3
Surface Finish Analysis in Single Point Incremental Sheet Forming of Rib-Stiffened 2024-T3 and 7075-T6 Alclad Aluminium Alloy Panels.
肋条加强型2024-T3和7075-T6包铝铝合金板单点渐进式板材成形中的表面光洁度分析
Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 27;14(7):1640. doi: 10.3390/ma14071640.
4
Experimental Investigation and Optimal Prediction of Maximum Forming Angle and Surface Roughness of an Al/SUS Bimetal Sheet in an Incremental Forming Process Using Machine Learning.基于机器学习的Al/SUS双金属板增量成形过程中最大成形角和表面粗糙度的实验研究与最优预测
Materials (Basel). 2019 Dec 11;12(24):4150. doi: 10.3390/ma12244150.
5
Machine learning algorithm validation with a limited sample size.机器学习算法在有限样本量下的验证。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 7;14(11):e0224365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224365. eCollection 2019.
6
Prediction of formation force during single-point incremental sheet metal forming using artificial intelligence techniques.使用人工智能技术预测单点渐进成形过程中的成形力。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 22;14(8):e0221341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221341. eCollection 2019.
7
Cross-Validation Methods.交叉验证方法。
J Math Psychol. 2000 Mar;44(1):108-132. doi: 10.1006/jmps.1999.1279.