Bender S, Hetherington S
Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.
J Clin Immunol. 1987 Nov;7(6):475-80. doi: 10.1007/BF00915058.
Immunoglobulin G may be prepared by different methods for intravenous infusion and administered as replacement therapy for hypogammaglobulinemia. Intravenous immunoglobulins prepared by different methods were compared in vitro for their ability to opsonize Haemophilus influenzae type b in the absence of complement and subsequently induce neutrophil chemiluminescence. While the antibody contents, measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and radioimmunoassay, were equivalent, the immunoglobulin prepared by a non-molecular modifying method (ion-exchange chromatography) had the greatest ability to induce bacterial-neutrophil interaction, measured by chemiluminescence, while a reduced and alkylated immunoglobulin had the least. Thus, preparative methods may have a profound effect upon the function of intravenous immunoglobulins. The biological function of immunoglobulins for clinical use can be compared easily by neutrophil chemiluminescence.
免疫球蛋白G可通过不同方法制备用于静脉输注,并作为低丙种球蛋白血症的替代疗法给药。对通过不同方法制备的静脉注射免疫球蛋白在体外进行比较,观察其在无补体情况下调理b型流感嗜血杆菌的能力以及随后诱导中性粒细胞化学发光的能力。虽然通过酶联免疫吸附测定法和放射免疫测定法测得的抗体含量相当,但通过非分子修饰方法(离子交换色谱法)制备的免疫球蛋白诱导细菌-中性粒细胞相互作用的能力最强(通过化学发光测定),而还原烷基化免疫球蛋白的能力最弱。因此,制备方法可能对静脉注射免疫球蛋白的功能产生深远影响。通过中性粒细胞化学发光可轻松比较临床使用的免疫球蛋白的生物学功能。