• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用可穿戴运动传感器对中风幸存者的 360°转身进行运动学分析。

Kinematic Analysis of 360° Turning in Stroke Survivors Using Wearable Motion Sensors.

机构信息

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA.

Department of Physical Therapy, Crean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 5;22(1):385. doi: 10.3390/s22010385.

DOI:10.3390/s22010385
PMID:35009931
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8749703/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A stroke often bequeaths surviving patients with impaired neuromusculoskeletal systems subjecting them to increased risk of injury (e.g., due to falls) even during activities of daily living. The risk of injuries to such individuals can be related to alterations in their movement. Using inertial sensors to record the digital biomarkers during turning could reveal the relevant turning alterations.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, movement alterations in stroke survivors (SS) were studied and compared to healthy individuals (HI) in the entire turning task due to its requirement of synergistic application of multiple bodily systems.

METHODS

The motion of 28 participants (14 SS, 14 HI) during turning was captured using a set of four Inertial Measurement Units, placed on their sternum, sacrum, and both shanks. The motion signals were segmented using the temporal and spatial segmentation of the data from the leading and trailing shanks. Several kinematic parameters, including the range of motion and angular velocity of the four body segments, turning time, the number of cycles involved in the turning task, and portion of the stance phase while turning, were extracted for each participant.

RESULTS

The results of temporal processing of the data and comparison between the SS and HI showed that SS had more cycles involved in turning, turn duration, stance phase, range of motion in flexion-extension, and lateral bending for sternum and sacrum (-value < 0.035). However, HI exhibited larger angular velocity in flexion-extension for all four segments. The results of the spatial processing, in agreement with the prior method, showed no difference between the range of motion in flexion-extension of both shanks (-value > 0.08). However, it revealed that the angular velocity of the shanks of leading and trailing legs in the direction of turn was more extensive in the HI (-value < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The changes in upper/lower body segments of SS could be adequately identified and quantified by IMU sensors. The identified kinematic changes in SS, such as the lower flexion-extension angular velocity of the four body segments and larger lateral bending range of motion in sternum and sacrum compared to HI in turning, could be due to the lack of proper core stability and effect of turning on vestibular system of the participants. This research could facilitate the development of a targeted and efficient rehabilitation program focusing on the affected aspects of turning movement for the stroke community.

摘要

背景

中风常导致幸存患者的神经肌肉骨骼系统受损,使他们在日常生活活动中甚至更容易受伤(例如,由于跌倒)。这些个体受伤的风险可能与他们运动的改变有关。使用惯性传感器记录转身过程中的数字生物标志物可以揭示相关的转身变化。

目的

本研究旨在研究中风幸存者(SS)的运动变化,并将其与健康个体(HI)在整个转身任务中的运动变化进行比较,因为转身任务需要协同应用多个身体系统。

方法

使用一组四个惯性测量单元(放置在胸骨、骶骨和两个小腿上)来捕捉 28 名参与者(14 名 SS,14 名 HI)在转身过程中的运动。使用数据的时间和空间分割来分割运动信号,来自领先和尾随小腿的。为每个参与者提取了几个运动学参数,包括四个身体部位的运动范围和角速度、转身时间、转身任务涉及的周期数以及转身过程中站立阶段的部分。

结果

数据的时间处理结果和 SS 与 HI 之间的比较表明,SS 参与转身的周期更多,转身持续时间、站立阶段、胸骨和骶骨屈伸的运动范围以及屈伸时的站立阶段更大(-值<0.035)。然而,HI 所有四个部位的屈伸角速度都较大。空间处理的结果与之前的方法一致,两个小腿的屈伸运动范围没有差异(-值>0.08)。然而,它表明在 HI 中,转弯方向的主导和尾随腿的小腿角速度更广泛(-值<0.01)。

结论

IMU 传感器可以充分识别和量化 SS 上下体节段的变化。在转身过程中,SS 出现的运动学变化,如四个身体部位的下屈伸角速度降低,胸骨和骶骨的侧向弯曲运动范围增大,与 HI 相比,这些变化可能是由于核心稳定性不足和参与者的转身对前庭系统的影响。这项研究可以促进针对中风群体转身运动受影响方面的有针对性和有效的康复计划的发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1a8/8749703/c26a068a8f42/sensors-22-00385-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1a8/8749703/2c9159dd8fb0/sensors-22-00385-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1a8/8749703/c26a068a8f42/sensors-22-00385-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1a8/8749703/2c9159dd8fb0/sensors-22-00385-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1a8/8749703/c26a068a8f42/sensors-22-00385-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Kinematic Analysis of 360° Turning in Stroke Survivors Using Wearable Motion Sensors.使用可穿戴运动传感器对中风幸存者的 360°转身进行运动学分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 5;22(1):385. doi: 10.3390/s22010385.
2
Kinematic Assessment of Turning and Walking Tasks Among Stroke Survivors by Employing Wearable Sensors and Pressure Platform.利用可穿戴传感器和压力平台评估脑卒中幸存者的转弯和行走任务的运动学评估。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021 Nov;2021:6635-6638. doi: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630791.
3
Post-Stroke Functional Changes: In-Depth Analysis of Clinical Tests and Motor-Cognitive Dual-Tasking Using Wearable Sensors.中风后功能变化:使用可穿戴传感器对临床试验和运动认知双重任务的深入分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Apr 2;11(4):349. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11040349.
4
Independent and sensitive gait parameters for objective evaluation in knee and hip osteoarthritis using wearable sensors.使用可穿戴传感器进行膝关节和髋关节骨关节炎的客观评估的独立且敏感的步态参数。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Mar 3;22(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04074-2.
5
Wearable-Based Kinematic Analysis of Upper-Limb Movements During Daily Activities Could Provide Insights into Stroke Survivors' Motor Ability.基于可穿戴设备的日常活动中上肢运动的运动学分析可为中风幸存者的运动能力提供见解。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2024 Sep;38(9):659-669. doi: 10.1177/15459683241270066. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
6
Clinically acceptable agreement between the ViMove wireless motion sensor system and the Vicon motion capture system when measuring lumbar region inclination motion in the sagittal and coronal planes.当在矢状面和冠状面测量腰椎区域倾斜运动时,ViMove无线运动传感器系统与Vicon运动捕捉系统之间具有临床可接受的一致性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Mar 21;18(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1489-1.
7
Validation of IMU-based gait event detection during curved walking and turning in older adults and Parkinson's Disease patients.基于惯性测量单元的老年人和帕金森病患者在曲线行走和转弯时的步态事件检测的验证。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Feb 6;18(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00828-0.
8
Functional range of motion in the upper extremity and trunk joints: Nine functional everyday tasks with inertial sensors.上肢和躯干关节的功能活动范围:使用惯性传感器进行的九项日常功能任务。
Gait Posture. 2019 May;70:141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.02.024. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
9
Inertial Measurement Unit Based Upper Extremity Motion Characterization for Action Research Arm Test and Activities of Daily Living.基于惯性测量单元的上肢运动特征分析用于动作研究臂测试和日常生活活动。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Apr 14;19(8):1782. doi: 10.3390/s19081782.
10
Beyond timing and step counting in 360° turning-in-place assessment: a scoping review.360°原地转身评估中的时间和步数之外:范围综述。
Biomed Eng Online. 2024 Jan 31;23(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12938-024-01208-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Spanish consensus of occupational therapists on upper limb assessment tools in stroke.西班牙职业治疗师关于中风上肢评估工具的共识
Br J Occup Ther. 2023 Sep;86(9):648-658. doi: 10.1177/03080226231175574. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
2
Dual Tasking Affects the Outcomes of Instrumented Timed up and Go, Sit-to-Stand, Balance, and 10-Meter Walk Tests in Stroke Survivors.双重任务对脑卒中幸存者使用器械的计时起立行走测试、坐站测试、平衡测试和 10 米步行测试的结果有影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 9;24(10):2996. doi: 10.3390/s24102996.
3
Post-Stroke Functional Changes: In-Depth Analysis of Clinical Tests and Motor-Cognitive Dual-Tasking Using Wearable Sensors.

本文引用的文献

1
Kinematic Assessment of Turning and Walking Tasks Among Stroke Survivors by Employing Wearable Sensors and Pressure Platform.利用可穿戴传感器和压力平台评估脑卒中幸存者的转弯和行走任务的运动学评估。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021 Nov;2021:6635-6638. doi: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630791.
2
Smartphone-based human fatigue level detection using machine learning approaches.基于机器学习的智能手机人体疲劳程度检测。
Ergonomics. 2021 May;64(5):600-612. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1858185. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
3
A Method for Quantifying Trunk Motor Control During Reaching in Individuals Post Hemiparetic Stroke.
中风后功能变化:使用可穿戴传感器对临床试验和运动认知双重任务的深入分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Apr 2;11(4):349. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11040349.
4
Validity of an android device for assessing mobility in people with chronic stroke and hemiparesis: a cross-sectional study.安卓设备用于评估慢性中风和偏瘫患者活动能力的有效性:一项横断面研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Apr 15;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01346-5.
5
Therapists and patients perceptions of a mixed reality system designed to improve trunk control and upper extremity function.治疗师和患者对旨在改善躯干控制和上肢功能的混合现实系统的看法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 19;14(1):6598. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55692-4.
6
Fall Risk Assessment in Stroke Survivors: A Machine Learning Model Using Detailed Motion Data from Common Clinical Tests and Motor-Cognitive Dual-Tasking.脑卒中幸存者跌倒风险评估:使用常见临床测试和运动认知双重任务的详细运动数据的机器学习模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 26;24(3):812. doi: 10.3390/s24030812.
7
Beyond timing and step counting in 360° turning-in-place assessment: a scoping review.360°原地转身评估中的时间和步数之外:范围综述。
Biomed Eng Online. 2024 Jan 31;23(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12938-024-01208-0.
8
Assessment of functional fitness impacted by hospital rehabilitation in post-stroke patients who additionally contracted COVID-19.评估 COVID-19 后合并脑卒中的住院康复患者的功能性体能。
PeerJ. 2024 Jan 5;12:e16710. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16710. eCollection 2024.
9
Assessment of Passive Upper Limb Stiffness and Its Function in Post-Stroke Individuals Wearing an Inertial Sensor during the Pendulum Test.评估惯性传感器佩戴者在钟摆试验中的被动上肢僵硬程度及其功能。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 27;23(7):3487. doi: 10.3390/s23073487.
10
Sensor based assessment of turning during instrumented Timed Up and Go Test for quantifying mobility in chronic stroke patients.基于传感器的仪器化计时起立行走测试中转身评估用于量化慢性脑卒中患者的活动能力。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Feb;59(1):6-13. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07647-X. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
一种量化偏瘫性脑卒中患者伸手够物时躯干运动控制的方法。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020 Jul;2020:3743-3746. doi: 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176096.
4
Using a Motion Sensor to Categorize Nonspecific Low Back Pain Patients: A Machine Learning Approach.使用运动传感器对非特异性下腰痛患者进行分类:一种机器学习方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 26;20(12):3600. doi: 10.3390/s20123600.
5
Gait impairments in Parkinson's disease.帕金森病的步态障碍。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jul;18(7):697-708. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30044-4. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
6
Trunk flexor and extensor muscle performance in chronic stroke patients: a case-control study.慢性脑卒中患者躯干屈肌和伸肌的运动表现:病例对照研究。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2018 May-Jun;22(3):231-237. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
7
The burden of neurological disease in the United States: A summary report and call to action.美国神经系统疾病负担:总结报告与行动呼吁。
Ann Neurol. 2017 Apr;81(4):479-484. doi: 10.1002/ana.24897.
8
Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Research: Issues, Opportunities, and the National Institutes of Health StrokeNet.中风恢复与康复研究:问题、机遇与美国国立卫生研究院中风网络
Stroke. 2017 Mar;48(3):813-819. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015501. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
9
Timed Up and Go test: Comparison of kinematics between patients with chronic stroke and healthy subjects.计时起立行走测试:慢性卒中患者与健康受试者之间的运动学比较。
Gait Posture. 2016 Sep;49:258-263. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.06.023. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
10
Characteristics of daily life gait in fall and non fall-prone stroke survivors and controls.跌倒倾向和非跌倒倾向中风幸存者及对照组的日常生活步态特征。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Jul 27;13(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0176-z.