IVAN FRANKO NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LVIV, LVIV, UKRAINE.
Wiad Lek. 2021;74(11 cz 2):2907-2911.
The aim: This paper is aimed to identify criteria with regard to which government should evaluate whether criminal penalties for non-compliance with the Covid-19 vaccination can be envisaged and reveal the community's attitude to support such criminalization.
Materials and methods: This research is based on the analysis of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, Supreme Court of the US, and Supreme Court of Ukraine; statistical database, in particular of the World Health Organization and survey of 100 Ukrainian residents. During the research of the stated issue systematic method, formal-legal method, comparative method and case study method were used.
Results: In total 100 respondents participated in the survey, of which 27 (27 %) are health care workers (17 doctors, 9 nurses and 1 medical registrar). 39 % of respondents supported the mandatory vaccination against Covid-19 for adults and 21 % have not yet decided. Almost the same results pertain to the compulsory vaccination of doctors and representatives of other target groups (retired, teachers, etc.) (supported by 52 % and 48 % respectively). By contrast, the compulsory Covid-19 vaccination of minors was supported only by 20 % respondents.
Conclusions: The international human rights law provides grounds to impose mandatory vaccination to control the spreading of Covid-19. Such vaccination constitutes the intervention with the right to physical integrity and can be justified only when it is clearly provided by law, pursue the legitimate aim of the protection of public health, and is necessary for a democratic society. This survey highlights the need to critically evaluate the implementation of non-compliance penalties to determine their effectiveness. Despite the well-recognized efficiency of the vaccination against Covid-19, society is still hesitant whether a mandate for such vaccination should be delivered and more reluctantly accepts other containment measures. Criminal penalties for non-compliance with Covid-19 vaccination are consistently opposed by society that pertains to the historical background on vaccination policy in a certain country.
本文旨在确定政府应评估是否可以考虑对违反 COVID-19 疫苗接种规定的行为进行刑事处罚的标准,并揭示公众对支持这种刑事化的态度。
本研究基于对欧洲人权法院、美国最高法院和乌克兰最高法院判例法的分析;统计数据库,特别是世界卫生组织和对 100 名乌克兰居民的调查。在研究所述问题时,使用了系统方法、形式法律方法、比较方法和案例研究方法。
共有 100 名受访者参加了调查,其中 27 名(27%)是医疗保健工作者(17 名医生、9 名护士和 1 名医疗登记员)。39%的受访者支持对成年人进行强制性 COVID-19 疫苗接种,21%尚未决定。同样的结果也适用于对医生和其他目标群体(退休人员、教师等)的强制接种(分别得到 52%和 48%的支持)。相比之下,只有 20%的受访者支持对未成年人进行强制性 COVID-19 疫苗接种。
国际人权法为实施强制性疫苗接种以控制 COVID-19 的传播提供了依据。这种疫苗接种构成了对身体完整性权利的干预,只有在法律明确规定、追求保护公共卫生的合法目的且对民主社会是必要的情况下,才能得到证明。本调查强调需要批判性地评估不遵守规定的处罚的实施情况,以确定其有效性。尽管 COVID-19 疫苗接种的效果得到广泛认可,但社会仍对是否应该强制接种疫苗犹豫不决,更不愿意接受其他遏制措施。社会普遍反对对违反 COVID-19 疫苗接种规定的行为进行刑事处罚,这与特定国家的疫苗接种政策历史背景有关。