Suppr超能文献

主要干扰因素对初级保健质量改进计划中促进实践参与的影响。

The Effects of Major Disruptions on Practice Participation in Facilitation During a Primary Care Quality Improvement Initiative.

机构信息

From the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Research Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ (JRH, BFC); Section of General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs (VA) Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR (STE); Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (STE); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (STE, SV, AB, JDH, DJC); School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (CKP); Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Science, UTHealth School of Public Health, Dallas, TX (BAB); Implementation Pathways, LLC and VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI (LD); HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN (LIS).

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Jan-Feb;35(1):124-139. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.01.210205.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disruptions in primary care practices, like ownership change, clinician turnover, and electronic health record system implementation, can stall quality improvement (QI) efforts. However, little is known about the relationship between these disruptions and practice participation in facilitated QI.

METHODS

We explore this relationship using data collected from EvidenceNOW in a mixed-methods convergent design. EvidenceNOW was a large-scale facilitation-based QI initiative in small and medium primary care practices. Data included practice surveys, facilitator time logs, site visit field notes, and interviews with facilitators and practices. Using multivariate regression, we examined associations between disruptions during interventions and practice participation in facilitation, measured by in-person facilitator hours in 987 practices. We analyzed qualitative data on 40 practices that described disruptions. Qualitative and quantitative teams iterated analyses based on each other's emergent findings.

RESULTS

Many practices (51%) reported experiencing 1 or more disruptions during the 3- to 15-month interventions. Loss of clinicians (31.6%) was most prevalent. In adjusted analyses, disruptions were not significantly associated with participation in facilitation. Qualitative data revealed that practices that continued active participation were motivated, had some QI infrastructure, and found value in working with their facilitators. Facilitators enabled practice participation by doing EHR-related work for practices, adapting work for available staff, and helping address needs beyond the explicit aims of EvidenceNOW.

CONCLUSIONS

Disruptions are prevalent in primary care, but practices can continue participating in QI interventions, particularly when supported by a facilitator. Facilitators may benefit from additional training in approaches for helping practices attenuate the effects of disruptions and adapting strategies to help interventions work to continue building QI capacity.

摘要

背景

初级保健实践中的中断,如所有权变更、临床医生更替和电子健康记录系统的实施,可能会阻碍质量改进(QI)的努力。然而,人们对这些中断与实践参与促进 QI 之间的关系知之甚少。

方法

我们使用从 EvidenceNOW 收集的数据,在混合方法收敛设计中探索了这种关系。EvidenceNOW 是一项针对小型和中型初级保健实践的大规模基于促进的 QI 计划。数据包括实践调查、促进者时间记录、现场访问现场笔记以及对促进者和实践的访谈。我们使用多元回归分析了干预期间中断与实践参与促进之间的关系,以 987 家实践中的面对面促进者小时数来衡量。我们对描述中断的 40 个实践进行了定性数据分析。定性和定量团队根据彼此的新兴发现对分析进行了迭代。

结果

许多实践(51%)报告在 3 至 15 个月的干预期间经历了 1 次或多次中断。临床医生流失(31.6%)最为普遍。在调整后的分析中,中断与参与促进没有显著关联。定性数据显示,继续积极参与的实践具有积极性、有一些 QI 基础设施,并认为与促进者合作具有价值。促进者通过为实践完成与 EHR 相关的工作、根据可用人员调整工作以及帮助解决超出 EvidenceNOW 明确目标的需求,使实践能够继续参与。

结论

中断在初级保健中很常见,但实践可以继续参与 QI 干预,特别是在得到促进者支持的情况下。促进者可能受益于额外的培训,以帮助实践减轻中断的影响,并调整策略以帮助干预工作继续建立 QI 能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验