Suppr超能文献

通过在 EA/IRMS 之前转化为硫酸钡,对砷化物、硫砷化物以及砷和汞的硫化物进行安全、准确和精确的硫同位素分析。

Safe, accurate, and precise sulfur isotope analyses of arsenides, sulfarsenides, and arsenic and mercury sulfides by conversion to barium sulfate before EA/IRMS.

机构信息

Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics (IDYST), University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Institute of Geochemistry and Petrology, Department of Earth Sciences, ETH, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Anal Bioanal Chem. 2022 Mar;414(6):2163-2179. doi: 10.1007/s00216-021-03854-y. Epub 2022 Jan 23.

Abstract

The stable isotope ratios of sulfur (δS relative to Vienna Cañon Diablo Troilite) in sulfates and sulfides determined by elemental analysis and isotope ratio mass spectrometry (EA/IRMS) have been proven to be a remarkable tool for studies of the (bio)geochemical sulfur cycles in modern and ancient environments. However, the use of EA/IRMS to measure δS in arsenides and sulfarsenides may not be straightforward. This difficulty can lead to potential health and environmental hazards in the workplace and analytical problems such as instrument contamination, memory effects, and a non-matrix-matched standardization of δS measurements with suitable reference materials. To overcome these practical and analytical challenges, we developed a procedure for sulfur isotope analysis of arsenides, which can also be safely used for EA/IRMS analysis of arsenic sulfides (i.e., realgar, orpiment, arsenopyrite, and arsenian pyrite), and mercury sulfides (cinnabar). The sulfur dioxide produced from off-line EA combustion was trapped in an aqueous barium chloride solution in a leak-free system and precipitated as barium sulfate after quantitative oxidation of hydrogen sulfite by hydrogen peroxide. The derived barium sulfate was analyzed by conventional EA/IRMS, which bracketed the δS values of the samples with three international sulfate reference materials. The protocol (BaSO-EA/IRMS) was validated by analyses of reference materials and laboratory standards of sulfate and sulfides and achieved accuracy and precision comparable with those of direct EA/IRMS. The δS values determined by BaSO-EA/IRMS in sulfides (arsenopyrite, arsenic, and mercury sulfides) samples from different origins were comparable to those obtained by EA/IRMS, and no sulfur isotope fractionations were introduced during sample preparation. We report the first sulfur isotope data of arsenides obtained by BaSO-EA/IRMS.

摘要

通过元素分析和同位素比质谱法(EA/IRMS)测定的硫酸盐和硫化物中硫的稳定同位素比值(相对于维也纳峡谷陨石 Troilite 的 δS)已被证明是研究现代和古代环境中(生物)地球化学硫循环的重要工具。然而,使用 EA/IRMS 测量砷化物和硫砷化物中的 δS 可能并不简单。这种困难可能会导致工作场所的潜在健康和环境危害以及分析问题,例如仪器污染、记忆效应以及缺乏与合适参比材料相匹配的 δS 测量的标准化。为了克服这些实际和分析上的挑战,我们开发了一种砷化物硫同位素分析程序,该程序也可安全用于 EA/IRMS 分析砷硫化物(即雄黄、雌黄、毒砂和砷黝铜矿)和汞硫化物(朱砂)。在线 EA 燃烧产生的二氧化硫在无泄漏系统中被捕获在氯化钡水溶液中,并在过氧化氢定量氧化亚硫酸氢盐后沉淀为硫酸钡。衍生的硫酸钡通过常规的 EA/IRMS 进行分析,该方法用三种国际硫酸盐参比材料对样品的 δS 值进行了约束。该方案(BaSO-EA/IRMS)通过对参比材料和硫酸盐和硫化物实验室标准品的分析得到了验证,并实现了与直接 EA/IRMS 相当的准确性和精密度。来自不同来源的硫化物(毒砂、砷和汞硫化物)样品中通过 BaSO-EA/IRMS 确定的 δS 值与通过 EA/IRMS 获得的值相当,并且在样品制备过程中没有引入硫同位素分馏。我们报告了通过 BaSO-EA/IRMS 获得的砷化物的第一批硫同位素数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53b5/8821489/30af06c3e629/216_2021_3854_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验