reflectance confocal microscopy of wounds: feasibility of intraoperative basal cell carcinoma margin assessment.

BACKGROUND

reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is well established in non-melanoma skin cancer detection and screening. However, there is no sufficient validation regarding intraoperatively obtained images of wound margins. A reliable and fast resection margin detection is of high clinical relevance. Hence, we aimed to investigate feasibility and validity of RCM imaging for wound margins assessment compared with standard skin surface imaging and the gold standard histopathology.

METHODS

A surgical incision through the center of a large basal cell carcinoma (BCC) affected area in the head and face region was performed. After removing half of the tumor, the wound margins of the remaining half as well as the corresponding skin surface were scanned with an RCM. A total of 50 wound margin images with BCC, 50 images of BCC-free margins and the corresponding skin surface images from 50 patients were compared with each other and with histopathological findings. Presence of confocal diagnostic criteria for BCC in images was analyzed.

RESULTS

An overall sensitivity and specificity in detection of BCC in wound margins was 88.5%, and 91.7% compared to skin surface imaging and 97.8% and 90.7%, respectively, compared to histopathology. We identified all known confocal patterns of healthy skin and BCC in wound margin scans: damage of the epidermal layer above the lesion and cellular pleomorphism, elongated and monomorphic basaloid nuclei, nuclear polarization, an increased number of dilated blood vessels with high leukocyte traffic, inflammatory cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of RCM imaging of wound margins is comparable with a standard skin surface imaging. The intraoperative detection of BCC areas in wound margins is as precise as the standard skin imaging and may be supportive for surgical interventions.