Renter David G, Dodd Charles C, Noll Lance W, Nagaraja T G, Ives Samuel E
Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506.
Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506.
J Food Prot. 2022 Apr 1;85(4):701-705. doi: 10.4315/JFP-21-426.
Following removal of hides and viscera during beef processing, carcasses are inspected for tissue adhesions that can affect meat quality or harbor bacteria. Carcasses with pleural or abdominal adhesions may be diverted from the production line for manual excision and then returned to the line. No published data indicate whether adhesion excision is associated with bacterial contamination. Therefore, our objective was to determine the presence and concentration of generic Escherichia coli and non-E. coli coliforms from the internal and external surfaces of carcasses that were, or were not, diverted for adhesion excision. During 9 processing days over a 4-month period in a large commercial beef processing facility, 1,738 carcass sponge samples from 2,730 cm2 areas on both the internal and the external surfaces of carcasses with and without tissue adhesions were collected. Coliforms and E. coli were cultured and enumerated using Petrifilm procedures, and data were analyzed with mixed models. Coliforms were present at higher concentrations than E. coli, and prevalence and mean log concentrations of both coliforms and E. coli were significantly higher for samples from the external than from the internal surfaces of carcasses. However, differences in prevalence and concentration of coliforms between external and internal surfaces varied significantly based on whether carcasses had adhesions excised. The difference was greatest for coliforms present on the external (2.06 log CFU/100 cm2) versus the internal (0.93 log CFU/100 cm2) carcass surfaces without adhesions, whereas the difference in concentrations from the external (1.80 log CFU/100 cm2) and the internal (1.31 log CFU/100 cm2) surfaces of carcasses with adhesions was not as large. These results indicate that surveillance of carcass bacteria may be affected by whether the external versus the internal surfaces are sampled and whether carcasses are diverted for excision of adhesions.
在牛肉加工过程中去除兽皮和内脏后,要对胴体进行检查,查看是否存在会影响肉质或滋生细菌的组织粘连。有胸膜或腹部粘连的胴体可能会从生产线上转移下来进行人工切除,然后再返回生产线。尚无公开数据表明粘连切除是否与细菌污染有关。因此,我们的目标是确定被转移进行粘连切除或未被转移的胴体内外表面上的通用大肠杆菌和非大肠杆菌大肠菌群的存在情况和浓度。在一家大型商业牛肉加工设施中,在4个月内的9个加工日期间,从有或没有组织粘连的胴体内外表面2730平方厘米区域采集了1738份胴体海绵样本。使用Petrifilm程序培养并计数大肠菌群和大肠杆菌,并用混合模型分析数据。大肠菌群的浓度高于大肠杆菌,胴体外表面样本中大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的流行率和平均对数浓度均显著高于内表面样本。然而,根据胴体是否进行了粘连切除,内外表面大肠菌群的流行率和浓度差异有显著变化。对于没有粘连的胴体外表面(2.06 log CFU/100平方厘米)和内表面(0.93 log CFU/100平方厘米)上存在的大肠菌群,差异最大,而有粘连的胴体外表面(1.80 log CFU/100平方厘米)和内表面(1.31 log CFU/100平方厘米)的浓度差异则没有那么大。这些结果表明,胴体细菌监测可能会受到采样的是外表面还是内表面以及胴体是否被转移进行粘连切除的影响。