School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China.
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China.
Water Res. 2022 Apr 1;212:118090. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118090. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
Antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), as emerging pollutants, are released into environment, increasing the risk of horizontal gene transfer (HGT). However, a limited number of studies quantified the effects of ARB disinfection on the HGT risk. This study investigated the inactivation of E. coli 10667 (sul) and the release and removal of ARGs using an electrochemical flow-through reactor (EFTR). Furthermore, the transfer frequencies and potential mechanisms of HGT after disinfection were explored using non-resistant E. coli GMCC 13373 as the recipient and E. coli DH5α carrying plasmid RP4 as the donor. A threshold of current density (0.25 mA/cm) was observed to destroy cells and release intracellular ARGs (iARGs) to increase extracellular ARGs (eARGs) concentration. The further increase in the current density to 1 mA/cm resulted in the decline of eARGs concentration due to the higher degradation rate of eARGs than the release rate of iARGs. The performance of ARGs degradation and HGT frequency by EFTR were compared with those of conventional disinfection processes, including chlorination and ultraviolet radiation (UV). A higher ARGs degradation (83.46%) was observed by EFTR compared with that under chlorination (10.23%) and UV (27.07%). Accordingly, EFTR reduced the HGT frequency (0.69) of released ARGs into the recipient (Forward transfer), and the value was lower than that by chlorination (2.69) and UV (1.73). Meanwhile, the surviving injured E. coli 10667 (sul) with increased cell permeability was transferred by plasmid RP4 from the donor (Reverse transfer) with a higher frequency of 0.33 by EFTR compared with that under chlorination (0.26) and UV (0.16). In addition, the sul3 gene was the least resistant to EFTR than sul1 and sul2 gene. These findings provide important insights into the mechanism of HGT between the injured E. coli 10667 (sul) and environmental bacteria. EFTR is a promising disinfection technology for preventing the spread of antibiotic resistance.
抗药性细菌 (ARB) 和抗药性基因 (ARGs) 作为新兴污染物,被释放到环境中,增加了水平基因转移 (HGT) 的风险。然而,目前仅有少数研究量化了 ARB 消毒对抗 HGT 风险的影响。本研究采用电化学流动式反应器 (EFTR) ,考察了大肠杆菌 10667(sul) 的失活动力学和 ARGs 的释放与去除。此外,利用非抗性大肠杆菌 GMCC 13373 作为受体和携带质粒 RP4 的大肠杆菌 DH5α 作为供体,探讨了消毒后 HGT 的转移频率和潜在机制。观察到电流密度 (0.25 mA/cm) 的阈值可以破坏细胞并将细胞内 ARGs (iARGs) 释放到细胞外 ARGs (eARGs) 浓度增加。当电流密度进一步增加到 1 mA/cm 时,由于 eARGs 的降解速率高于 iARGs 的释放速率,eARGs 浓度下降。与氯化和紫外线辐射 (UV) 等传统消毒工艺相比,EFTR 对 ARGs 降解和 HGT 频率的性能进行了比较。与氯化 (10.23%) 和 UV (27.07%) 相比,EFTR 对 ARGs 的降解率更高 (83.46%)。因此,EFTR 降低了释放的 ARGs 进入受体的 HGT 频率 (正向转移) ,该值低于氯化 (2.69) 和 UV (1.73) 。同时,细胞通透性增加的受损大肠杆菌 10667(sul) 通过质粒 RP4 从供体 (反向转移) 进行了更高频率的转移,EFTR 下的转移频率为 0.33,高于氯化 (0.26) 和 UV (0.16) 。此外,sul3 基因比 sul1 和 sul2 基因对 EFTR 的抵抗力更差。这些发现为受损大肠杆菌 10667(sul) 与环境细菌之间 HGT 的机制提供了重要的见解。EFTR 是一种有前途的消毒技术,可用于防止抗生素耐药性的传播。