BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Salford, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Nov;65(6):101635. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101635. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
Research into prosthesis training and design puts a burden on the small population of people with upper-limb absence who can participate in these studies. One solution is to use a prosthetic hand simulator, which allows for attaching a hand prosthesis to an intact limb. However, whether the results of prosthesis simulator studies can be translated to people with upper-limb absence using a hand prosthesis is unclear.
To review the literature on prosthetic hand simulators, provide an overview of current designs, and highlight the differences and similarities between prosthesis simulators and traditional prostheses.
A Boolean combination of keywords was used to search 3 electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Relevant articles in English were selected.
In total, 52 papers were included in the review, and an overview of the state of the art was presented. We identified the key differences between prosthesis simulators and traditional prostheses as the position of the terminal device and the available degrees of freedom of the arm and (prosthetic) wrist.
This paper provides an overview of prosthesis simulator designs over the past 27 years and an overview of the similarities and differences between prosthesis simulators and prostheses. The literature does not provide enough evidence to establish whether the results obtained from simulator studies could be translated to prostheses. A recommendation for future simulator design is to constrain pro- and supination of the forearm of anatomically intact participants and add a prosthetic wrist that can pro- and supinate. Additional research is required to find the ideal terminal device position for a prosthesis simulator with respect to the person's hand.
假体训练和设计的研究给能够参与这些研究的上肢缺失人群带来了负担。一种解决方案是使用假肢模拟器,它可以将假肢连接到完整的肢体上。然而,假肢模拟器研究的结果是否可以转化为使用假肢的上肢缺失人群尚不清楚。
综述假肢模拟器的文献,概述当前设计,并强调假肢模拟器与传统假肢之间的差异和相似之处。
使用布尔组合关键词在 3 个电子数据库(PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science)中进行搜索。选择英文相关文章。
共纳入 52 篇论文进行综述,并介绍了假肢模拟器的最新设计。我们确定了假肢模拟器和传统假肢之间的关键区别在于末端设备的位置和手臂及(假肢)腕部的可用自由度。
本文概述了过去 27 年来假肢模拟器的设计,并概述了假肢模拟器与假肢之间的相似性和差异。文献没有提供足够的证据来确定从模拟器研究中获得的结果是否可以转化为假肢。未来模拟器设计的建议是限制解剖完整参与者前臂的内旋和外旋,并添加可以内旋和外旋的假肢腕部。需要进一步研究以找到假肢模拟器的理想末端设备位置,以适应患者的手。