Am J Epidemiol. 2022 May 20;191(6):1061-1070. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac017.
We recently evaluated associations of biomarker-calibrated protein intake, protein density, carbohydrate intake, and carbohydrate density with the incidence of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes among postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative (1993-present, 40 US clinical centers). The biomarkers relied on serum and urine metabolomics profiles, and biomarker calibration used regression of biomarkers on food frequency questionnaires. Here we develop corresponding calibration equations using food records and dietary recalls. In addition, we use calibrated intakes based on food records in disease association estimation in a cohort subset (n = 29,294) having food records. In this analysis, more biomarker variation was explained by food records than by FFQs for absolute macronutrient intake, with 24-hour recalls being intermediate. However, the percentage of biomarker variation explained was similar for each assessment approach for macronutrient densities. Invasive breast cancer risk was related inversely to carbohydrate and protein densities using food records, in analyses that included (calibrated) total energy intake and body mass index. Corresponding analyses for absolute intakes did not differ from the null, nor did absolute or relative intakes associate significantly with colorectal cancer or coronary heart disease. These analyses do not suggest major advantages for food records or dietary recalls in comparison with less costly and logistically simpler food frequency questionnaires for these nutritional variables.
我们最近评估了生物标志物校准后的蛋白质摄入量、蛋白质密度、碳水化合物摄入量和碳水化合物密度与绝经后妇女心血管疾病、癌症和糖尿病发病率之间的关联,这些妇女来自妇女健康倡议(1993 年至今,40 个美国临床中心)。这些生物标志物依赖于血清和尿液代谢组学特征,并且生物标志物校准使用了生物标志物对食物频率问卷的回归。在这里,我们使用食物记录和饮食回忆来开发相应的校准方程。此外,我们在具有食物记录的队列子集中(n=29294)使用基于食物记录的校准摄入量来进行疾病关联估计。在这项分析中,与食物频率问卷相比,食物记录可以更好地解释绝对宏量营养素摄入量的生物标志物变化,而 24 小时回忆则处于中间位置。然而,对于宏量营养素密度,每种评估方法解释生物标志物变化的百分比是相似的。在包括(校准)总能量摄入和体重指数的分析中,使用食物记录,发现碳水化合物和蛋白质密度与侵袭性乳腺癌风险呈负相关。对于绝对摄入量的相应分析与零值没有差异,也没有绝对或相对摄入量与结直肠癌或冠心病显著相关。这些分析表明,对于这些营养变量,与成本更低、逻辑更简单的食物频率问卷相比,食物记录或饮食回忆并没有明显的优势。