García-Mejido José Antonio, González-Diaz Enrique, Ortega Ismael, Borrero Carlota, Fernández-Palacín Ana, Sainz-Bueno José Antonio
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Feb;12(2):959-966. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-707.
Recently, a specific methodology has been defined, using transperineal ultrasound, for the differential diagnosis of middle compartment prolapse [uterine prolapse (UP) or cervical elongation (CE) without UP] based on the difference in the pubis-uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver, with a cutoff point of 15 mm. The objective of this study was to validate the diagnostic utility of a ≥15 mm difference between the pubis-uterine fundus distance at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver to define UP in a multicenter study.
This prospective multicenter observational study included 94 patients (UP =51; CE without UP =43). The clinical examination was based on the International Continence Society Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (ICS POP-Q) system for assessing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and patients were candidates for corrective surgery of the middle compartment of the pelvic floor (correction of UP or CE without UP). The ultrasound study was performed by transperineal ultrasound (B-mode) with the patient undergoing dorsal lithotomy. The distance evaluation was performed in relation to the posteroinferior pubic margin in the midsagittal plane, with reference to the uterine fundus (established as the most distal hyperechogenic) line from the pubis to the uterine fundus at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver. We defined UP detected using UP as a difference of ≥15 mm between the pubis-uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver. Agreement between the clinical and ultrasound diagnosis of UP was assessed using the Cohen kappa coefficient of agreement and its 95% CIs.
The ultrasound diagnosis of global UP at the three centers showed very good agreement, with a kappa index of 0.826 (0.71, 0.94). The agreement of ultrasound with the clinical diagnosis of UP using the ICS POP-Q system was very good for each of the hospitals [Hospital 1: 0.814 (0.64, 0.98), Hospital 2: 0.847 (0.64, 1) and Hospital 3: 0.824 (0.59, 1)].
A difference of ≥15 mm between the pubis-uterine fundus distance at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver for the diagnosis of UP presents very good agreement with the results of clinical evaluation with the ICS POP-Q system.
最近,已经定义了一种使用经会阴超声的特定方法,用于基于静息时和瓦尔萨尔瓦动作时耻骨-子宫底距离的差异,对中盆腔脏器脱垂[子宫脱垂(UP)或无UP的宫颈延长(CE)]进行鉴别诊断,临界值为15毫米。本研究的目的是在一项多中心研究中验证静息时和瓦尔萨尔瓦动作时耻骨-子宫底距离相差≥15毫米对定义UP的诊断效用。
这项前瞻性多中心观察性研究纳入了94例患者(UP = 51例;无UP的CE = 43例)。临床检查基于国际尿控协会盆腔器官脱垂定量(ICS POP-Q)系统来评估盆腔器官脱垂(POP),且患者均为盆底中盆腔矫正手术(矫正UP或无UP的CE)的候选者。超声检查采用经会阴超声(B超模式),患者取膀胱截石位。距离评估是在矢状面相对于耻骨后下缘进行的,以子宫底(确定为最远端高回声)为参照,测量静息时以及瓦尔萨尔瓦动作时从耻骨到子宫底的距离。我们将静息时和瓦尔萨尔瓦动作时耻骨-子宫底距离相差≥15毫米检测到的情况定义为UP。使用科恩一致性系数及其95%置信区间评估UP的临床诊断与超声诊断之间的一致性。
三个中心对整体UP的超声诊断显示出非常好的一致性,kappa指数为0.826(0.71,0.94)。超声与使用ICS POP-Q系统对UP进行的临床诊断之间的一致性在每家医院都非常好[医院1:0.814(0.64,0.98),医院2:0.847(0.64,1),医院3:0.824(0.59,1)]。
静息时和瓦尔萨尔瓦动作时耻骨-子宫底距离相差≥15毫米用于诊断UP,与使用ICS POP-Q系统进行临床评估的结果具有非常好的一致性。