Suppr超能文献

核心针活检诊断的导管原位癌浸润的预测因素。

Predictive factors of invasion in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core-needle biopsy.

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Fundación del Cáncer de Mama A.C. (FUCAM), Mexico City, Mexico.

Department of Mastology, Centro Médico Hospital Axxis, Quito, Ecuador.

出版信息

Cir Cir. 2022;90(1):41-49. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.21000136.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify clinical, radiological, and histopathological characteristics that could be predictive factors of microinvasive/invasive breast carcinoma in patients with diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by core-needle biopsy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study conducted from 2006-2017, which included women ≥18 years of age with initial DCIS, and who were treated with surgery. Final diagnosis was divided in DCIS and microinvasive/invasive carcinoma.

RESULTS

334 patients were included: 193 (57.8%) with DCIS and 141 (42.2%) with microinvasive/invasive carcinoma (microinvasive 5.1%, invasive 37.1%). Lymph node metastasis occurred in 16.3%. Differences between DCIS and microinvasive/invasive groups included the presence of palpable nodule (36.7% vs. 63.2%), radiological nodule (29% vs. 51%), bigger radiological-tumor size (1.2 cm vs. 1.7 cm), and larger microcalcification extension (2.5 cm vs. 3.1 cm), all of these variables p ≤0.05. Hormonal receptors and HER2 expression were similar. After logistic regression analysis, predictive factor of invasion was the presence of palpable nodule (OR = 4.072, 95%CI = 2.520-6.582, p <0.001) and radiological multicentric disease (OR = 1.677, 95%CI = 1.036-2.716, p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with DCIS, palpable nodule, and radiological multicentric disease, upgrade to microinvasive/invasive is high, and sentinel lymph node is recommended.

摘要

目的

通过核心针活检,确定可预测导管原位癌(DCIS)患者中微浸润/浸润性乳腺癌的临床、影像学和组织病理学特征。

材料与方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2006 年至 2017 年间年龄≥18 岁的初始诊断为 DCIS 并接受手术治疗的女性患者。最终诊断分为 DCIS 和微浸润/浸润性癌。

结果

共纳入 334 例患者:193 例(57.8%)为 DCIS,141 例(42.2%)为微浸润/浸润性癌(微浸润 5.1%,浸润 37.1%)。发生淋巴结转移者占 16.3%。DCIS 与微浸润/浸润组之间的差异包括可触及结节的存在(36.7% vs. 63.2%)、影像学结节(29% vs. 51%)、更大的影像学肿瘤大小(1.2cm vs. 1.7cm)和更大的微钙化延伸(2.5cm vs. 3.1cm),所有这些变量均为 p≤0.05。激素受体和 HER2 表达相似。经逻辑回归分析,浸润的预测因素为可触及结节(OR=4.072,95%CI=2.520-6.582,p<0.001)和影像学多中心疾病(OR=1.677,95%CI=1.036-2.716,p=0.035)。

结论

在 DCIS 患者中,存在可触及结节和影像学多中心疾病时,升级为微浸润/浸润性的可能性较高,建议进行前哨淋巴结活检。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验