• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮血运重建术治疗多支血管病变或左主干冠状动脉疾病(OPTIMUM)手术禁忌患者的结局:原理与设计。

The Outcomes of Percutaneous RevascularizaTIon for Management of SUrgically Ineligible Patients With Multivessel or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (OPTIMUM) Registry: Rationale and Design.

机构信息

Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO, United States of America; University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States of America.

Columbia University and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States of America.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Aug;41:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2022.01.008
PMID:35120846
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines endorse coronary artery bypass as the preferred revascularization strategy for patients with left main and/or multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). However, many patients are deemed excessively high risk for surgery after Heart Team evaluation. No prospective studies have examined contemporary treatment patterns, rationale for surgical decision-making, completeness of revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and outcomes in this high-risk population with advanced CAD.

METHODS

We designed the Outcomes of Percutaneous RevascularizaTIon for Management of SUrgically Ineligible Patients with Multivessel or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (OPTIMUM) registry, a prospective, multicenter study of patients with "surgical anatomy" determined to be at prohibitive risk for bypass surgery. The primary outcome is comparison of observed to predicted 30-day mortality, with secondary outcomes of patient-reported health status and the association between completeness of revascularization and clinical outcomes. Patient characteristics driving surgical risk determinations will be reported, and peri-operative risk will be assessed using validated scoring methods. Angiograms will be assessed by an independent core laboratory, and clinical events will be adjudicated.

RESULTS

Clinical outcomes assessments will include 30-day and 1-year cardiovascular events, health status at 1, 6 and 12-months, and 5-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

OPTIMUM is the first prospective, multicenter study to examine treatment strategies and outcomes among multivessel CAD patients deemed ineligible for surgical revascularization after Heart Team assessment. This registry will provide unique insights into the clinical decision-making, revascularization practices, safety, effectiveness, and health status outcomes in this high-risk population.

摘要

背景

指南支持冠状动脉旁路移植术作为左主干和/或多支冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者首选的血运重建策略。然而,许多患者在心脏团队评估后被认为手术风险过高。没有前瞻性研究研究过这种高危人群中晚期 CAD 的当代治疗模式、手术决策的理由、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的血运重建完整性和结果。

方法

我们设计了经皮血运重建治疗多支血管或左主干 CAD 手术不适合患者的结果(OPTIMUM)登记研究,这是一项多中心前瞻性研究,纳入了“手术解剖学”被确定为搭桥手术禁忌风险的患者。主要结果是观察到的与预测的 30 天死亡率的比较,次要结果是患者报告的健康状况和血运重建完整性与临床结果之间的关联。将报告驱动手术风险决策的患者特征,并使用经过验证的评分方法评估围手术期风险。将由独立核心实验室评估血管造影,并对临床事件进行裁决。

结果

临床结果评估将包括 30 天和 1 年心血管事件、1、6 和 12 个月的健康状况以及 5 年死亡率。

结论

OPTIMUM 是第一项前瞻性、多中心研究,旨在检查经心脏团队评估后被认为不适合手术血运重建的多支 CAD 患者的治疗策略和结果。该登记研究将为高危人群的临床决策、血运重建实践、安全性、有效性和健康状况结果提供独特的见解。

相似文献

1
The Outcomes of Percutaneous RevascularizaTIon for Management of SUrgically Ineligible Patients With Multivessel or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (OPTIMUM) Registry: Rationale and Design.经皮血运重建术治疗多支血管病变或左主干冠状动脉疾病(OPTIMUM)手术禁忌患者的结局:原理与设计。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Aug;41:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
2
Characteristics and outcomes of surgically ineligible patients with multivessel disease treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多支血管病变手术不适合患者的特征及结局
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Dec 1;98(7):1223-1229. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29508. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
3
Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients turned down for surgical revascularization.因手术血运重建被拒绝的患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul;90(1):94-101. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26781. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
4
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
5
Revascularization Trends in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Presenting With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get with the Guidelines (NCDR ACTION Registry-GWTG).伴有非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的糖尿病合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建趋势:来自国家心血管数据注册库急性冠状动脉治疗和干预结果网络注册库-遵循指南行动(NCDR ACTION注册库-GWTG)的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 May;9(3):197-205. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002084. Epub 2016 May 10.
6
Outcomes of Medical Therapy Plus PCI for Multivessel or Left Main CAD Ineligible for Surgery.药物治疗联合 PCI 治疗不适合手术的多支血管病变或左主干 CAD 的结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Feb 13;16(3):261-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.01.003.
7
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:一项系统评价。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718.
8
Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Revascularization According to the SYNTAX Score.左主干冠状动脉疾病血运重建术根据 SYNTAX 评分。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep;12(9):e008007. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.008007. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架置入术治疗左主干或多支冠状动脉疾病:一项个体患者数据的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 26;9(24):2481-2489. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.008.
10
Comparison of a Simple Angiographic Approach With a Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery Score-Based Approach for Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting: A Pooled Analysis of Serial PRECOMBAT (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery Versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) Studies.比较单纯血管造影方法与紫杉醇经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和心脏手术评分方法在左主干冠状动脉支架置入中的协同作用:系列 PRECOMBAT(使用依维莫司洗脱支架在左主干冠状动脉疾病患者中进行旁路手术与血管成形术的随机比较的首项研究)的汇总分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan;11(1):e005374. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005374.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical Circulatory Support for Complex High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.复杂高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的机械循环支持
US Cardiol. 2023 Apr 4;17:e03. doi: 10.15420/usc.2022.26. eCollection 2023.
2
Mortality After Multivessel Revascularization in Patients With Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndromes.糖尿病合并急性冠脉综合征患者多支血管血运重建后的死亡率
JACC Adv. 2024 Sep 18;3(9):101203. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101203. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Does Mechanical Circulatory Support-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Improve Left Ventricular Function?
机械循环支持辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能否改善左心室功能?
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Aug 13;1(5):100387. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100387. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
4
Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Disease Who Were Recommended for But Declined Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.多支血管病变患者行冠状动脉介入治疗后结局:推荐行冠状动脉旁路移植术,但患者拒绝。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jun 4;13(11):e033931. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033931. Epub 2024 May 31.
5
The use of mechanical circulatory support in elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: a literature-based review.机械循环支持在择期高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用:基于文献的综述
Eur Heart J Open. 2024 Feb 9;4(2):oeae007. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae007. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2021: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials.《临床心脏病学进展 2021:关键临床试验综述》。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jun;39(6):2398-2437. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02136-y. Epub 2022 Apr 28.