DiStefano Michael J, Alexander G Caleb, Polsky Daniel, Anderson Gerard F
Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jun;70(6):1685-1694. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17692. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
Despite controversy among experts regarding aducanumab's approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, little is known about public opinion on this matter.
We conducted a representative survey of U.S. adults ages 35 and older to (1) determine opinions regarding aducanumab's approval, (2) identify any evidence of reputational injury to the Food and Drug Administration, and (3) explore opinions regarding policy responses available to policymakers, such as those relating to a national coverage determination by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The survey was administered online and in English and Spanish using a probability-based sample derived from the National Opinion Research Center's AmeriSpeak® panel. Selection probabilities in the panel and survey design account for differences in population distribution and expected response rates by demographic. The survey was analyzed using survey weights to adjust for selection probabilities and non-response.
A total of 1025 respondents completed the survey. While approximately three-quarters of respondents were initially unfamiliar with aducanumab, respondents were less supportive of the drug's approval once given information about the drug's potential clinical and economic impact. Sixty-three percent of respondents support restricting aducanumab access to patients most likely to benefit. Seventy-one percent indicated a willingness to enroll a family member with mild Alzheimer's disease in a "waitlist"-style trial to further study aducanumab; sixty percent indicated a willingness to enroll a family member in a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Eighty-one percent agree aducanumab should be withdrawn from the market if confirmatory trials fail. The median respondent was willing to pay $1-5 in higher Part B premiums to cover aducanumab.
These findings demonstrate support for a range of proposed policies in response to aducanumab's approval. The opinions of an informed public ought to be considered when developing policies in response to aducanumab's approval.
尽管专家们对美国食品药品监督管理局批准阿杜卡努单抗存在争议,但公众对此事的看法却鲜为人知。
我们对35岁及以上的美国成年人进行了一项具有代表性的调查,以(1)确定对阿杜卡努单抗获批的看法,(2)找出美国食品药品监督管理局声誉受损的任何证据,以及(3)探讨政策制定者可采取的政策应对措施的看法,例如与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的全国医保覆盖范围确定相关的措施。该调查通过在线方式进行,使用从全国民意研究中心的美国民意调查小组(AmeriSpeak®)中抽取的基于概率的样本,以英语和西班牙语进行。该小组的选择概率和调查设计考虑了人口分布的差异以及不同人口统计特征的预期回复率。使用调查权重对调查进行分析,以调整选择概率和无回复情况。
共有1025名受访者完成了调查。虽然约四分之三的受访者最初不熟悉阿杜卡努单抗,但在得知该药物潜在的临床和经济影响后,受访者对其获批的支持度降低。63%的受访者支持将阿杜卡努单抗的使用限制在最可能受益的患者中。71%的受访者表示愿意让患有轻度阿尔茨海默病的家庭成员参加“候补名单”式试验以进一步研究阿杜卡努单抗;60%的受访者表示愿意让家庭成员参加随机安慰剂对照试验。81%的受访者同意如果验证性试验失败,阿杜卡努单抗应从市场上撤下。受访者中位数愿意每月多支付1至5美元的B部分保费来支付阿杜卡努单抗费用。
这些发现表明公众支持一系列针对阿杜卡努单抗获批提出的政策。在制定应对阿杜卡努单抗获批的政策时,应该考虑有见识的公众的意见。