Single-Center Experience with Trabectedin for the Treatment of Non-L-sarcomas.

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness of trabectedin for the treatment of leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma (commonly referred to as L-sarcomas) has been widely evidenced in clinical trials and real-world studies. Nevertheless, available literature on non-L-sarcomas is less abundant. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of trabectedin in a cohort of patients with non-L-sarcomas in the real-world setting.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study included 34 patients who received trabectedin in the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Barcelona, Spain) between October 2013 and July 2020.

RESULTS

The most frequent histologic subtypes were undifferentiated spindle cell/pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 11, 32.4%), synovial sarcoma (n = 6, 17.7%), myxofibrosarcoma (n = 5, 14.7%), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (n = 4, 11.8%). The mean number of cycles with trabectedin was 5.5 (range 2-28). Three patients achieved partial response (8.8%) and eight patients showed stable disease (23.5%). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 8.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 95% CI 1.9-23.7) and 32.4% (95% CI 17.4-50.5), respectively. Overall, progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% CI 2.1-3.4). The overall survival was 7.3 months (95% CI 4.7-12.8). The most common trabectedin-related grade 3 adverse events were observed in 10 patients (26.5%), mostly being neutropenia (14.7%) and elevated transaminases (5.9%), whereas one patient (2.9%) reported grade 4 febrile neutropenia that required hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this real-life study consistently support that trabectedin is an effective and safe option for the treatment of patients with non-L-sarcoma after failure of anthracyclines and ifosfamide, or in patients who are unsuited to receive these agents.