Ruth Enid Zambrana (
David R. Williams, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Feb;41(2):163-170. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01439.
Research related to racism and health has evolved in recent decades, with a growing appreciation of the centrality of the social determinants of health, life-course approaches and structural racism, and other upstream factors as drivers of health inequities. Examining how race, class, and structural racism relate to each other and combine over the life course to affect health can facilitate a clearer understanding of the determinants of health. Yet there is ongoing discomfort in many public health and medical circles about research on racism, including opposition to the use of racial terminology. Similarly, most major national reports on racial and ethnic inequities in health have given limited attention to the role of racism. We conclude that there is a need to acknowledge the central role of racism in the national discourse on racial inequities in health, and paradigmatic shifts are needed to inform equity-driven policy and practice innovations that would tackle the roots of the problem of racism and dismantle health inequities.
近年来,与种族主义和健康相关的研究不断发展,人们越来越认识到健康的社会决定因素、生命历程方法和结构性种族主义以及其他上游因素作为健康不平等的驱动因素的核心地位。研究种族、阶级和结构性种族主义如何相互关联,并在整个生命历程中结合起来影响健康,可以更清楚地了解健康的决定因素。然而,在许多公共卫生和医学界,人们对种族主义研究仍感到不安,包括反对使用种族术语。同样,大多数关于种族和族裔健康不平等的主要国家报告都很少关注种族主义的作用。我们的结论是,需要承认种族主义在国家关于健康方面种族不平等的讨论中的核心作用,需要进行范式转变,以便为解决种族主义问题的根源和消除健康不平等提供信息驱动的政策和实践创新。