Suppr超能文献

择期腹部手术后入住重症监护病房老年患者的死亡危险因素:一项连续5年的回顾性研究

[Risk factors for death in elderly patients admitted to intensive care unit after elective abdominal surgery: a consecutive 5-year retrospective study].

作者信息

Li Shuwen, He Tianhui, Shen Feng, Wang Difen, Liu Xu, Qin Jingcheng, Xiao Chuan, Li Wei, Li Qing, Gao Daixiu

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, Guizhou, China. Corresponding author: Shen Feng, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Dec;33(12):1453-1458. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210804-00118.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk factors that were associated with the death of elderly patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after elective abdominal surgery, and to find reliable and sensitive predictive indicators for early interventions and reducing the mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted. The clinical data of elderly (age ≥ 65 years old) patients after elective abdominal surgery admitted to the ICU of the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from January 1st 2016 to December 31st 2020 were collected, including the patient's gender, age, body mass index (BMI), medical history, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades, surgical classification, intraoperative blood loss, duration of operation, interval time between end of operation and admission to the ICU, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score and the worst laboratory examination results within 24 hours of ICU admission, the first blood gas analysis in ICU, the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, and the length of ICU stay. Postoperative abdominal infection was evaluated by the pathogenic culture of peritoneal drainage fluid and clinical symptoms and signs. The patients were divided into death group and survival group based on clinical outcomes, and clinical data were compared between the two groups. Binary multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the risk factors of death, and the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was plotted to analyze the predictive values of these risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 226 elderly patients with elective abdominal surgery were admitted to the ICU of our hospital during the past 5 years, of whom, two patients who did not undergo laboratory examinations within 24 hours of admission to the ICU were excluded. Finally, 224 patients met the criteria, with 158 survivors and 66 deaths. Univariate analysis showed that: compared with survival group, APACHE II score, blood lactate acid (Lac) and the proportion of postoperative abdominal infection were higher in death group [APACHE II score: 27.5 (25.0, 31.3) vs. 23.0 (18.0, 27.0), Lac (mmol/L): 2.9 (1.8, 6.6) vs. 1.8 (1.1, 2.8), the proportion of postoperative abdominal infection: 65.2% (43/66) vs. 35.4% (56/158), all P < 0.01], prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and interval time between end of surgery and admission to ICU were longer [PT (s): 17.20 (14.50, 18.63) vs. 14.65 (13.90, 16.23), APTT (s): 45.15 (38.68, 55.15) vs. 39.45 (36.40, 45.70), interval time between end of surgery and admission to ICU (hours): 39.2 (0.7, 128.9) vs. 0.7 (0.3, 2.0), all P < 0.01], postoperative hemoglobin (Hb), platelet count (PLT), prealbumin (PA), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and oxygenation index (PaO/FiO) were lower in death group [Hb (g/L): 95.79±23.64 vs. 105.58±19.82, PLT (×10/L): 138.5 (101.0, 177.5) vs. 160.5 (118.5, 232.3), PA (g/L): 80.88±43.63 vs. 116.54±50.80, MAP (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 76.8±19.1 vs. 91.6±19.8, PaO/FiO (mmHg): 180.0 (123.5, 242.5) vs. 223.5 (174.8, 310.0), all P < 0.05]. Binary multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that APACHE II score [odds ratio (OR) = 1.187, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 1.008-1.294, P < 0.001], interval time between end of operation and admission to ICU (OR = 1.005, 95%CI = 1.001-1.009, P = 0.016) and postoperative abdominal infection (OR = 2.630, 95%CI = 1.148-6.024, P = 0.022) were independent risk factors for prognosis in these patients. MAP (OR = 0.978, 95%CI = 0.957-0.999, P = 0.041) and PaO/FiO (OR = 0.994, 95%CI = 0.990-0.998, P = 0.003) were protective factors for the patients' prognosis. Lac, Hb, PLT, PA, PT and APTT had no predictive value for the prognosis of elderly patients admitted to ICU after elective abdominal surgery [OR value and 95%CI were 1.075 (0.945-1.223), 1.011 (0.99-1.032), 1.000 (0.995-1.005), 0.998 (0.989-1.007), 1.051 (0.927-1.192) and 1.003 (0.991-1.016), respectively, all P > 0.05. ROC curve analysis showed that APACHE II score, interval time between end of operation and admission to the ICU and the postoperative abdominal infection had certain predictive values for the prognosis of elderly patients, the area under ROC curve (AUC) were 0.755, 0.732 and 0.649 respectively, all P < 0.001; When the cut-off of APACHE II score and interval time between end of operation and admission to the ICU were 24.5 scores and 2.15 hours, the sensitivity were 78.8% and 66.7%, respectively, and the specificity were 62.0% and 76.6%, respectively. The combined predictive value of the three variables was the highest, which AUC was 0.846, the joint prediction probability was 0.27, the sensitivity was 83.3%, and the specificity was 75.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

APACHE II score, interval time between end of surgery and admission to ICU, and postoperative abdominal infection may be independent risk factors for the death of elderly patients who were admitted to the ICU after elective abdominal surgery, there would be far greater predictive values when the three variables were combined.

摘要

目的

探讨择期腹部手术后入住重症监护病房(ICU)的老年患者死亡的相关危险因素,寻找可靠且敏感的预测指标以进行早期干预并降低死亡率。

方法

进行一项回顾性病例对照研究。收集2016年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间贵州医科大学附属医院ICU收治的择期腹部手术后老年(年龄≥65岁)患者的临床资料,包括患者性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、病史、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、手术分类、术中失血量、手术时长、手术结束至入住ICU的间隔时间、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分以及入住ICU后24小时内最差实验室检查结果、ICU首次血气分析、有创机械通气时长及ICU住院时长。通过腹腔引流液病原菌培养及临床症状体征评估术后腹部感染情况。根据临床结局将患者分为死亡组和存活组,比较两组临床资料。采用二元多因素Logistic回归分析筛选死亡危险因素,并绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)分析这些危险因素的预测价值。

结果

过去5年我院ICU共收治226例择期腹部手术老年患者,其中2例入住ICU后24小时内未进行实验室检查被排除。最终224例患者符合标准,158例存活,66例死亡。单因素分析显示:与存活组相比,死亡组APACHE II评分、血乳酸(Lac)及术后腹部感染比例更高[APACHE II评分:27.5(25.0,31.3)对23.0(18.0,27.0),Lac(mmol/L):2.9(1.8,6.6)对1.8(1.1,2.8),术后腹部感染比例:65.2%(43/66)对35.4%(56/158),均P<0.01],凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)及手术结束至入住ICU的间隔时间更长[PT(s):17.20(14.50,18.63)对14.65(13.90,16.23),APTT(s):45.15(38.68,55.15)对39.45(36.40,45.70),手术结束至入住ICU的间隔时间(小时):39.2(0.7,128.9)对0.7(0.3,2.0),均P<0.01],死亡组术后血红蛋白(Hb)、血小板计数(PLT)·、前白蛋白(PA)、平均动脉压(MAP)及氧合指数(PaO/FiO)更低[Hb(g/L):95.79±23.64对105.58±19.82,PLT(×10/L):138.5(101.0,177.5)对160.5(118.5,232.3),PA(g/L):80.88±43.63对116.54±50.80,MAP(mmHg,1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa):76.8±19.1对91.6±19.8,PaO/FiO(mmHg):180.0(123.5,242.5)对223.5(174.8,310.0),均P<0.05]。二元多因素Logistic回归分析显示APACHE II评分[比值比(OR)=1.187,95%置信区间(95%CI)=1.008 - 1.294,P<·0.001]、手术结束至入住ICU的间隔时间(OR = 1.005,95%CI = 1.001 - 1.009,P = 0.016)及术后腹部感染(OR = 2.630,95%CI = 1.148 - 6.024,P = 0.022)是这些患者预后的独立危险因素。MAP(OR = 0.978,95%CI = 0.957 - 0.999,P = 组患者预后的保护因素。Lac、Hb、PLT、PA、PT及APTT对择期腹部手术后入住ICU的老年患者预后无预测价值[OR值及95%CI分别为1.075(0.945 - 1.223)、1.011(0.99 - 1.032)、1.000(0.995 - 1.005)、0.998(0.989 - 1.00~)、1.051(0.927 - 1.192)及1.003(0.991 - 1.016),均P>0.05]。ROC曲线分析显示,APACHE II评分、手术结束至入住ICU的间隔时间及术后腹部感染对老年患者预后有一定预测价值,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.755、0.732及0.649,均P<0.001;当APACHE II评分及手术结束至入住ICU的间隔时间的截断值分别为24.5分和2.15小时时,敏感度分别为78.8%和66.7%,特异度分别为62.0%和76.6%。三个变量联合预测价值最高,AUC为0.846,联合预测概率为0.27,敏感度为83.3%,特异度为75.3%。

结论

APACHE II评分、手术结束至入住ICU的间隔时间及术后腹部感染可能是择期腹部手术后入住ICU老年患者死亡的独立危险因素,三者联合时预测价值更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验