Suppr超能文献

阿特珠单抗联合维莫非尼及考比替尼治疗BRAF突变阳性黑色素瘤的疗效生物标志物

Biomarkers of treatment benefit with atezolizumab plus vemurafenib plus cobimetinib in BRAF mutation-positive melanoma.

作者信息

Robert C, Lewis K D, Gutzmer R, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H, Protsenko S, Pereira R P, Eigentler T, Rutkowski P, Demidov L, Caro I, Forbes H, Shah K, Yan Y, Li H, McArthur G A, Ascierto P A

机构信息

Gustave Roussy and Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.

University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, USA.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2022 May;33(5):544-555. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.01.076. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The phase III IMspire150 study (NCT02908672) demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) with atezolizumab, vemurafenib, and cobimetinib (atezolizumab group) versus placebo, vemurafenib, and cobimetinib (control group) in patients with BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma. We report exploratory biomarker analyses to optimize targeting of patients who are more likely to benefit from triplet combination therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five hundred fourteen patients were randomized to atezolizumab (n = 256) or control (n = 258). Outcomes were evaluated in subgroups defined by key biomarkers, including programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) gene signature. Exploratory recursive partitioning analysis was then used to model associations between PFS and baseline covariates, including key biomarkers.

RESULTS

PFS benefit for atezolizumab versus control was greater in patients with high TMB [≥10 mutations/Mb; hazard ratio (HR) 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-1.02; P = 0.067] versus low TMB (<10 mutations/Mb; HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.65-1.30; P = 0.64) and similar between patients with strong IFN-γ (≥median; HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.54-1.06) versus weak IFN-γ (<median; HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.58-1.08). In patients with elevated LDH, PFS benefit for atezolizumab versus control was greater in the PD-L1- subgroup (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.29-0.95; P = 0.032) than in the PD-L1+ subgroup (HR 1.16; 95% CI 0.75-1.80; P = 0.51). Recursive partitioning analysis showed that IFN-γ discriminated PFS outcomes in patients with normal LDH, whereas TMB discriminated outcomes in patients with elevated LDH in the atezolizumab group. Neither IFN-γ nor TMB discriminated PFS outcomes in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment benefits in the atezolizumab group seemed to be most evident in patients with elevated LDH and PD-L1- tumors. LDH remains the primary predictor of outcomes regardless of treatment. IFN-γ and TMB further differentiate outcomes for patients treated with atezolizumab, vemurafenib, and cobimetinib.

摘要

背景

III期IMspire150研究(NCT02908672)表明,与安慰剂、维莫非尼和考比替尼(对照组)相比,阿替利珠单抗、维莫非尼和考比替尼(阿替利珠单抗组)可显著改善BRAF突变的晚期黑色素瘤患者的无进展生存期(PFS)。我们报告探索性生物标志物分析,以优化对更可能从三联联合治疗中获益的患者的靶向治疗。

患者和方法

514例患者被随机分为阿替利珠单抗组(n = 256)或对照组(n = 258)。在由关键生物标志物定义的亚组中评估结局,包括程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平、肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)和干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)基因特征。然后使用探索性递归划分分析来模拟PFS与基线协变量(包括关键生物标志物)之间的关联。

结果

高TMB[≥10个突变/Mb;风险比(HR)0.73;95%置信区间(CI)0.52 - 1.02;P = 0.067]的患者中,阿替利珠单抗组相对于对照组的PFS获益大于低TMB(<10个突变/Mb;HR 0.92;95% CI 0.65 - 1.30;P = 0.64)的患者,且强IFN-γ(≥中位数;HR 0.76;95% CI 0.54 - 1.06)的患者与弱IFN-γ(<中位数;HR 0.79;95% CI 0.58 - 1.08)的患者之间的PFS获益相似。在LDH升高的患者中,阿替利珠单抗组相对于对照组的PFS获益在PD-L1-亚组(HR 0.53;95% CI 0.29 - 0.95;P = 0.032)中大于PD-L1+亚组(HR 1.16;95% CI 0.75 - 1.80;P = 0.51)。递归划分分析表明,IFN-γ在LDH正常的患者中区分PFS结局,而TMB在阿替利珠单抗组中区分LDH升高患者的结局。IFN-γ和TMB在对照组中均未区分PFS结局。

结论

阿替利珠单抗组的治疗获益在LDH升高和PD-L1-肿瘤的患者中似乎最为明显。无论治疗如何,LDH仍然是结局的主要预测指标。IFN-γ和TMB进一步区分了接受阿替利珠单抗、维莫非尼和考比替尼治疗的患者的结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验