Management, Healthcare Systems, and Health Policy (Dr Hoff), and School of Pharmacy (Dr Lee), Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Qual Manag Health Care. 2022;31(3):160-169. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000359. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
The use of telehealth has risen dramatically due to the Covid-19 pandemic and is expected to be a regular part of patient care moving forward. We know little currently about how satisfied physicians are with this type of patient care. The present systematic review examines physician satisfaction with telehealth, as physician acceptance remains vital to telehealth gaining wider and more permanent adoption.
A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)-guided systematic review of empirical articles published between 2010 and 2020 that contain a finding examining physician satisfaction with using telehealth, using 4 article databases (PubMed, Web of Science, COCHRANE, and CINAHL), to identify relevant studies. A standardized data abstraction Excel sheet was used to extract relevant information from each of the included studies. Relevant study findings related to physician satisfaction with telehealth were reviewed for each of the 37 studies by the coauthors.
A total of 37 published studies were included in the review. Thirty-three of the 37 (89%) studies reviewed were classified as having findings showing moderate to high levels of physician satisfaction with telehealth. Just under 60% of the studies focused on physician satisfaction with providing telemedicine to patients (21/37). Twelve other studies focused on physician satisfaction with teleconsultations with other providers. Four studies examined physician satisfaction with both. The type of patient telemedicine or provider teleconsultation performed varied greatly across the 37 studies, with several different diagnoses or care situations included. Research designs used in the studies were less robust, with all studies using primary data for assessing physician satisfaction but only one study providing any type of multivariate analysis of physician satisfaction with telehealth.
The results of this review support the observation that physicians across different specialties, geographic locations, practice locations, and care situations appear satisfied with engaging in telehealth for both patient care and consultations with other physicians. The research on telehealth should be enhanced, given how ubiquitous telehealth has become due to the Covid-19 pandemic. This enhancement should include larger physician sample sizes in studies of telehealth satisfaction; more research focused on telehealth in the primary care setting; and the types of virtual modalities that have become more commonplace for physicians to use due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
由于新冠疫情,远程医疗的使用急剧增加,预计未来将成为患者护理的常规组成部分。目前,我们对医生对这种类型的患者护理的满意度知之甚少。本系统评价检查了医生对远程医疗的满意度,因为医生的接受度对于远程医疗的更广泛和更永久的采用仍然至关重要。
在 2010 年至 2020 年期间发表的包含使用远程医疗的医生满意度检查结果的实证文章进行了 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指导的系统评价,使用了 4 个文章数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、COCHRANE 和 CINAHL),以确定相关研究。使用标准化的数据提取 Excel 表格从纳入的每项研究中提取相关信息。由共同作者对 37 项研究中的每一项与医生对远程医疗的满意度相关的研究结果进行了回顾。
共纳入 37 项已发表的研究。在 37 项研究中,有 33 项(89%)被归类为具有医生对远程医疗满意度高或中度的研究结果。近 60%的研究侧重于医生对向患者提供远程医疗的满意度(21/37)。另外 12 项研究侧重于医生对与其他提供者进行远程咨询的满意度。四项研究同时检查了医生对两者的满意度。37 项研究中进行的患者远程医疗或提供者远程咨询的类型差异很大,包括多种不同的诊断或护理情况。研究设计在研究中不够稳健,所有研究都使用原始数据评估医生对远程医疗的满意度,但只有一项研究提供了任何类型的远程医疗满意度的多变量分析。
本综述的结果支持这样的观察结果,即来自不同专业、地理位置、实践地点和护理情况的医生似乎对参与远程医疗进行患者护理和与其他医生进行咨询都感到满意。鉴于远程医疗因新冠疫情而变得无处不在,应该加强远程医疗的研究。这一增强应该包括更大的医生样本量,研究远程医疗满意度;更多的研究集中在初级保健环境中的远程医疗;以及由于新冠疫情而变得更为常见的虚拟模式类型。