Ilié Marius, Beaulande Mélanie, Long-Mira Elodie, Bontoux Christophe, Zahaf Katia, Lalvée Salomé, Hamila Marame, Benzaquen Jonathan, Cohen Charlotte, Berthet Jean-Philippe, Marquette Charles-Hugo, Lassalle Sandra, Hofman Véronique, Hofman Paul
Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, FHU OncoAge, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France; Hospital-Related Biobank (BB-0033-00025), FHU OncoAge, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France; Institute of Research on Cancer and Ageing of Nice (IRCAN), CNRS, INSERM, FHU OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
EMEA-LATAM division, Roche Diagnostics France, Meylan, France.
Lung Cancer. 2022 Apr;166:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.01.022. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
The evaluation of an increasing number of diagnostic and predictive markers is playing a central role in precision thoracic oncology. Multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC), alongside next-generation sequencing, is ideally situated for this purpose and maximizes tumor tissue preservation for molecular analyses that use increasingly large panels. However, the standardization and validation of mIHC that supports routine clinical laboratory processes are mandatory. After a previous proof-of-concept study, we now (i) optimized two automated four-plex assays on a commercially available IHC autostainer for use in daily practices worldwide and (ii) evaluated the repeatability and concordance of the assessment of the cell density.
Two four-plex mIHC assays [i) TTF1, p40, PD-L1, CD8; and, ii) ALK, ROS1, BRAFV600E, NTRK] were optimized on the BenchMark ULTRA autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.), as determined in comparison to conventional IHC chromogenic assays. Intra-site repeatability was evaluated on serial tumor sections from non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC). The concordance was assessed by linear fit to plots of the percentage staining evaluated on tumor sections from 89 NSCLC patients.
Following optimization, an average concordance for a staining rate of 95.4% was achieved between conventional IHC and mIHC across all selected markers. Assessment of intra-site repeatability showed strong concordance for all these markers (average, R = 0.96; P-value < 0.001).
Our optimized mIHC assay gave a sensitive and repeatable assessment of two panels of eight diagnostic and predictive biomarkers for NSCLC. The availability of standardized protocols to determine these biomarkers on a widely available IHC platform will expand the number of pathology laboratories able to determine the eligibility of patients with NSCLC for targeted treatment or immunotherapy in a reliable and concordant manner, thus providing a unique sample-sparing tool to characterize limited tissue samples in thoracic oncology.
对越来越多的诊断和预测标志物进行评估在精准胸部肿瘤学中发挥着核心作用。多重免疫组化(mIHC)与下一代测序一样,非常适合用于此目的,并能最大程度地保留肿瘤组织,以便用于使用越来越大的检测组的分子分析。然而,支持常规临床实验室流程的mIHC标准化和验证是必不可少的。在先前的概念验证研究之后,我们现在(i)在市售的免疫组化自动染色仪上优化了两种自动化四联检测方法,以供全球日常使用,并且(ii)评估了细胞密度评估的重复性和一致性。
在BenchMark ULTRA自动染色仪(Ventana Medical Systems公司)上优化了两种四联mIHC检测方法 [i)TTF1、p40、PD-L1、CD8;以及ii)ALK、ROS1、BRAFV600E、NTRK],并与传统免疫组化显色检测方法进行比较。在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的连续肿瘤切片上评估了位点内重复性。通过对89例NSCLC患者肿瘤切片上评估的染色百分比绘制线性拟合图来评估一致性。
优化后,在所有选定标志物上,传统免疫组化与mIHC之间的染色率平均一致性达到95.4%。位点内重复性评估显示所有这些标志物具有很强的一致性(平均值,R = 0.96;P值 < 0.001)。
我们优化的mIHC检测方法对两组共八个NSCLC诊断和预测生物标志物进行了灵敏且可重复的评估。在广泛使用的免疫组化平台上确定这些生物标志物的标准化方案的可用性,将使能够以可靠且一致的方式确定NSCLC患者是否适合接受靶向治疗或免疫治疗的病理实验室数量增加,从而提供一种独特的节省样本工具,用于在胸部肿瘤学中表征有限的组织样本。