Suppr超能文献

喜马拉雅盐与普通食盐摄入对高血压个体尿钠和血压影响的比较。

Comparison between the Effects of Hymalaian Salt and Common Salt Intake on Urinary Sodium and Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Individuals.

机构信息

Liga de Hipertensão Arterial - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO - Brasil.

Hospital das Clínicas - Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO - Brasil.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022 May;118(5):875-882. doi: 10.36660/abc.20210069.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Himalayan salt (HS) has become a popular alternative for the traditional table salt (TS) due to its health benefit claims, particularly for individuals with arterial hypertension. However, despite the increase in HS consumption, there is still a lack of clinical evidence to support a recommendation for its consumption by health professionals.

OBJECTIVE

This cross-over study aimed to compare the impact of HS and TS intake on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and urinary sodium concentration in individuals with arterial hypertension.

METHODS

This study recruited 17 female patients with arterial hypertension who ate out no more than once a week. Participants were randomized into two groups, to receive and consume either HS or TS. Before and after each intervention, participants had their blood pressure measured and urine collected for mineral analysis. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences before and after the HS intervention for DBP (70mmHg vs. 68.5mmHg; p=0.977), SBP (118.5 mmHg vs. 117.5 mmHg; p= 0.932) and sodium urinary concentration (151 mEq/24h vs. 159 mEq/24; p=0.875). Moreover, the between-group analysis showed no significant differences after the intervention regarding SBP (117mmHg vs 119 mmHg; p=0.908), DBP (68.5 mmHg vs. 71mmHg; p= 0,645) or sodium urinary concentration (159 mEq/24h vs. 155 mEq/24h; p=0.734).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that there are no significant differences on the impact of HS consumption compared to TS on blood pressure and sodium urinary concentration in individuals with arterial hypertension.

摘要

背景

喜马拉雅盐(HS)因其健康益处而成为传统食盐(TS)的流行替代品,特别是对动脉高血压患者而言。然而,尽管 HS 的消费有所增加,但仍然缺乏临床证据来支持健康专业人员推荐其消费。

目的

本交叉研究旨在比较 HS 和 TS 摄入对动脉高血压患者的收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)以及尿钠浓度的影响。

方法

本研究招募了 17 名每周外出就餐不超过一次的动脉高血压女性患者。参与者被随机分为两组,分别接受和摄入 HS 或 TS。在每次干预前后,参与者测量血压并收集尿液进行矿物质分析。p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

HS 干预前后 DBP(70mmHg 对 68.5mmHg;p=0.977)、SBP(118.5mmHg 对 117.5mmHg;p=0.932)和尿钠浓度(151mEq/24h 对 159mEq/24h;p=0.875)均无统计学差异。此外,干预后组间分析显示 SBP(117mmHg 对 119mmHg;p=0.908)、DBP(68.5mmHg 对 71mmHg;p=0.645)或尿钠浓度(159mEq/24h 对 155mEq/24h;p=0.734)无显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,与 TS 相比,HS 摄入对动脉高血压患者的血压和尿钠浓度没有显著影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a93/9368875/e9d753fedb3c/0066-782X-abc-118-05-0875-gf01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验