PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Nedlands, Western Australia.
PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Nedlands, Western Australia; School of Medicine & School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Western Australia, Australia.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2022 Mar 1;1192:123134. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2022.123134. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
Erythrocyte membrane-incorporated phosphatidylethanol (PEth) forms only in the presence of ethanol and, once formed, provides a persisting marker for historical alcohol consumption. Relationships between PEth concentration, extent of consumption and time from consumption are under investigation. Threshold values of PEth have been proposed as indicators for any, or for harmful alcohol consumption. Here, we describe an assay for erythrocyte PEth 16:0/18:1 that offers the efficiency needed for routine clinical deployment, in the context of a fully validated methodology. However, we observe that conventional procedures for validating assay methodology are insufficient where the analyte of interest, membrane-incorporated PEth 16:0/18:1, has different physicochemical properties to the soluble PEth 16:0/18:1 and PEth 16:0/18:1-d5 that are used for making calibrator, controls and internal standards. Whereas the internal standard did fully correct for differences in matrix effects and recovery when different extraction solvents were applied to calibrators and controls (in soluble form), it failed to correct for a 1.5-fold difference in the relative efficiency of two solvents, in this case, acetonitrile and isopropanol in extracting PEth from erythrocyte membrane in clinical samples. Differences in the efficiency of the extraction of membrane-bound PEth translate to different results from the same specimen. That can mean that threshold values derived by one methodology cannot be safely generalised to another. That hampers the generalisability of individual laboratory's experience with PEth assay results. Harmonising extraction methodology between laboratories becomes very important where membrane-incorporated PEth itself remains unavailable as an assay standard.
红细胞膜结合的磷脂酰乙醇(PEth)仅在乙醇存在的情况下形成,一旦形成,就为历史饮酒提供了持久的标志物。目前正在研究 PEth 浓度、消耗程度和消耗后时间之间的关系。PEth 的阈值已被提议作为任何或有害饮酒的指标。在这里,我们描述了一种用于红细胞 PEth 16:0/18:1 的测定方法,该方法在完全验证的方法学背景下提供了常规临床应用所需的效率。然而,我们观察到,对于感兴趣的分析物,即与可溶性 PEth 16:0/18:1 和用于制作校准品、对照品和内标品的 PEth 16:0/18:1-d5 相比,膜结合的 PEth 16:0/18:1 具有不同的物理化学性质,常规验证测定方法学的程序是不够的。虽然当应用不同的提取溶剂于校准品和对照品(以可溶性形式)时,内标品完全纠正了基质效应和回收率的差异,但当在临床样本中从红细胞膜中提取 PEth 时,两种溶剂相对效率的 1.5 倍差异时,内标品无法纠正。膜结合的 PEth 提取效率的差异导致来自同一标本的不同结果。这意味着一种方法学衍生的阈值不能安全地推广到另一种方法学。这阻碍了个体实验室使用 PEth 测定结果的经验的普遍性。在膜结合的 PEth 本身仍然无法作为测定标准的情况下,实验室之间的萃取方法学的协调变得非常重要。