Williams Rapheal G, Li Kevin H, Phillips Paul E M
Center for Excellence in Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain and Emotion, Seattle, WA, United States.
Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Seattle, WA, United States.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 25;12:814218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.814218. eCollection 2021.
The actions of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in the core of the nucleus accumbens including increasing dopamine release and inducing conditioned place preference in stress-naïve animals. However, following two-day, repeated forced swim stress (rFSS), neither of these effects are present, indicating a stress-sensitive interaction between CRF and dopamine. To ascertain the degree to which this mechanism influences integrated, reward-based decision making, we used an operant concurrent-choice task where mice could choose between two liquid receptacles containing a sucrose solution or water delivery. Following initial training, either a CRF or dopamine antagonist, α-helical CRF (9-41) and flupenthixol, respectively, or vehicle was administered intracranially to the nucleus accumbens core. Next, the animals underwent rFSS, were reintroduced to the task, and were retested. Prior to stress, mice exhibited a significant preference for sucrose over water and made more total nose pokes into the sucrose receptacle than the water receptacle throughout the session. There were no observed sex differences. Stress did not robustly affect preference metrics but did increase the number of trial omissions compared to their stress-naïve, time-matched counterparts. Interestingly, flupenthixol administration did not affect sucrose choice but increased their nosepoke preference during the inter-trial interval, increased trial omissions, and decreased the total nosepokes during the ITI. In contrast, microinjections of α-helical CRF (9-41) did not affect omissions or ITI nosepokes but produced interactions with stress on choice metrics. These data indicate that dopamine and CRF both interact with stress to impact performance in the task but influence different behavioral aspects.
促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子(CRF)在伏隔核核心的作用包括增加多巴胺释放以及在未经历应激的动物中诱导条件性位置偏爱。然而,在经历为期两天的重复强迫游泳应激(rFSS)后,这些效应均未出现,这表明CRF与多巴胺之间存在应激敏感的相互作用。为了确定这种机制在多大程度上影响基于奖励的综合决策,我们使用了一种操作性并发选择任务,其中小鼠可以在两个装有蔗糖溶液或水的液体容器之间进行选择。在初始训练后,分别向伏隔核核心颅内注射CRF拮抗剂或多巴胺拮抗剂α-螺旋CRF(9-41)和氟哌噻吨,或注射赋形剂。接下来,让动物接受rFSS,重新引入该任务,并进行重新测试。在应激前,小鼠表现出对蔗糖的显著偏爱,并且在整个实验过程中对蔗糖容器的总鼻触次数比对水容器的多。未观察到性别差异。应激并未强烈影响偏爱指标,但与未经历应激、时间匹配的对照组相比,确实增加了试验遗漏的次数。有趣的是,注射氟哌噻吨并不影响对蔗糖的选择,但增加了它们在试验间隔期间的鼻触偏爱,增加了试验遗漏次数,并减少了试验间隔期间的总鼻触次数。相比之下,微量注射α-螺旋CRF(9-41)并不影响遗漏次数或试验间隔期间的鼻触次数,但在选择指标上与应激产生了相互作用。这些数据表明,多巴胺和CRF都与应激相互作用以影响任务表现,但影响不同的行为方面。