Suppr超能文献

肺腺癌细胞学涂片上间变性淋巴瘤激酶和c-ros原癌基因1基因重排的多重荧光原位杂交检测:与福尔马林固定石蜡包埋切片的比较研究

Multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization testing for anaplastic lymphoma kinase and c-ros oncogene 1 gene rearrangements on cytology smears in lung adenocarcinomas: comparative study with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections.

作者信息

Nambirajan Aruna, Rana Deeksha, Samant Komal, Prabakaran Aswini, Malik Prabhat, Jain Deepali

机构信息

Departments of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. B.R.A.IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2022 May-Jun;11(3):154-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Multiplex anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)/c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes conserve tissue by analyzing both ALK and ROS1 gene rearrangements (ALK-R/ROS1-R) in a single test. The positivity cutoffs have been validated on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections and not tested on non-cell block (CB) cytology preparations. We sought to validate non-CB cytology preparations for the detection of ALK-R/ROS1-R using multiplex ALK/ROS1 FISH probes by comparing the results with matched FFPE results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During the 3.5-year study period, FISH using the FlexISH ALK/ROS1 DistinguISH Probe (ZytoVision) was performed in non-CB cytology preparations of patients for whom FISH on FFPE sections was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients had one or more non-CB cytology preparations (n = 27) suitable for FISH analysis. These comprised direct smears (n = 17), smears from centrifuged effusion pellets (n = 8), cytospin smears (n = 1), and biopsy imprint smears (n = 1). These had been fixed in 95% ethanol (n = 18) or air dried (n = 9), and stained with Papanicolaou (n = 14), May-Grünwald-Giemsa (n = 9), immunocytochemistry (n = 3), or hematoxylin and eosin (n = 1). The median archival time was 1 year. Successful FISH results were achieved in 14 samples (6 with ALK-R, 2 with ROS1-R, 6 negative) and were concordant with the FFPE FISH results for 13 of 14 cases. The single case with discordant results between cytology and FFPE FISH showed ALK-R on cytology concordant with positive ALK D5F3 companion diagnostics assay results and was considered a false-negative FFPE FISH result. FISH failure occurred mainly in the older archived slides because of overdigestion (n = 5), hybridization failure (n = 5), or excessive background fluorescence (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-CB cytology smears are highly suitable for multiplex FISH analysis with 100% concordance with FFPE FISH and/or ALK D5F3 companion diagnostics assay results.

摘要

引言

多重间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)/c-ros癌基因1(ROS1)荧光原位杂交(FISH)探针通过在单次检测中分析ALK和ROS1基因重排(ALK-R/ROS1-R)来节省组织。阳性临界值已在福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织切片上得到验证,但尚未在非细胞块(CB)细胞学标本上进行测试。我们试图通过将结果与匹配的FFPE结果进行比较,验证使用多重ALK/ROS1 FISH探针检测ALK-R/ROS1-R的非CB细胞学标本。

材料与方法

在3.5年的研究期间,对已进行FFPE切片FISH检测的患者的非CB细胞学标本,使用FlexISH ALK/ROS1 DistinguISH探针(ZytoVision)进行FISH检测。

结果

共有20例患者有一个或多个适合FISH分析的非CB细胞学标本(n = 27)。这些标本包括直接涂片(n = 17)、离心积液沉淀物涂片(n = 8)、细胞离心涂片(n = 1)和活检压印涂片(n = 1)。这些标本用95%乙醇固定(n = 18)或空气干燥(n = 9),并用巴氏染色法(n = 14)、May-Grünwald-Giemsa染色法(n = 9)、免疫细胞化学法(n = 3)或苏木精和伊红染色法(n = 1)染色。存档时间中位数为1年。14个样本(6个ALK-R、2个ROS1-R、6个阴性)获得了成功的FISH结果,14例中有13例与FFPE FISH结果一致。细胞学与FFPE FISH结果不一致的唯一一例在细胞学上显示ALK-R,与ALK D5F3伴随诊断检测结果阳性一致,被认为是FFPE FISH的假阴性结果。FISH失败主要发生在存档时间较长的玻片上,原因是过度消化(n = 5)、杂交失败(n = 5)或背景荧光过多(n = 3)。

结论

非CB细胞学涂片非常适合多重FISH分析,与FFPE FISH和/或ALK D5F3伴随诊断检测结果100%一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验