Laredo Viviana, Gargallo-Puyuelo Carla J, Gomollón Fernando
Department of Gastroenterology, University Clinic Hospital Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Institute for Health Research Aragón (IIS Aragón), 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 4;11(3):829. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030829.
The availability of biologic therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing significantly. This represents more options to treat patients, but also more difficulties in choosing the therapies, especially in the context of bio-naïve patients. Most evidence of safety and efficacy came from clinical trials comparing biologics with placebo, with a lack of head-to-head studies. Network meta-analysis of biologics and real-world studies have been developed to solve this problem. Despite the results of these studies, there are also other important factors to consider before choosing the biologic, such as patient preferences, comorbidities, genetics, and inflammatory markers. Given that resources are limited, another important aspect is the cost of biologic therapy, since biosimilars are widely available and have been demonstrated to be effective with a significant decrease in costs. In this review, we summarize the evidence comparing biologic therapy in both Crohn´s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in different clinical situations. We also briefly synthesize the evidence related to predictors of biologic response, as well as the biologic use in extraintestinal manifestations and the importance of the drug-related costs.
炎症性肠病(IBD)生物疗法的可及性正在显著增加。这为治疗患者提供了更多选择,但在选择治疗方法时也面临更多困难,尤其是对于初治患者而言。大多数安全性和有效性证据来自生物制剂与安慰剂对比的临床试验,缺乏头对头研究。生物制剂的网状荟萃分析和真实世界研究已开展以解决这一问题。尽管有这些研究结果,但在选择生物制剂之前还有其他重要因素需要考虑,如患者偏好、合并症、遗传学和炎症标志物。鉴于资源有限,生物疗法的成本是另一个重要方面,因为生物类似药广泛可得且已证明有效,同时成本大幅降低。在本综述中,我们总结了不同临床情况下比较克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC)生物疗法的证据。我们还简要综合了与生物制剂反应预测指标相关的证据,以及生物制剂在肠外表现中的应用和药物相关成本的重要性。