Verdecchia Paolo, Angeli Fabio, Reboldi Gianpaolo
Fondazione Umbra Cuore e Ipertensione-ONLUS and Division of Cardiology, Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy (P.V.).
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese (F.A.).
Hypertension. 2022 May;79(5):1028-1036. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.18969. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
It is unclear whether the prognostic value of blood pressure (BP) changes from day to night is modified by concomitant risk factors and organ damage.
We studied 3247 clinically hypertensive patients who underwent off-therapy 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring during their initial diagnostic work-up. Over a mean 9.9-year follow-up, 292 patients developed a first primary outcome event (composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure) and 281 died. The day-night BP changes were analyzed as night-to-day systolic BP ratio and included in semiparametric Cox models.
After allowance for age, sex, diabetes, cigarette smoking, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, serum uric acid and average 24-hour systolic BP, the night-to-day systolic BP ratio maintained an independent association with outcome (hazard ratio, 1.17 [1.01-1.35]; =0.041). When 2 markers of organ damage, chronic kidney disease and left ventricular hypertrophy, were added to the model, the night-to-day systolic BP ratio failed to maintain an independent association with outcome (hazard ratio, 1.19 [0.97-1.31]). The Akaike Information Criterion and the Schwarz-Bayes Information Criterion showed that, after allowance for other covariables, the night-to-day systolic BP ratio: (1) provided less information when compared with chronic kidney disease and left ventricular hypertrophy and (2) did not improve information provided by chronic kidney disease and left ventricular hypertrophy. Results were comparable on all-cause death as well as using categories of the night-day systolic BP ratio (extreme dippers, dippers, nondippers, reverse dippers).
Chronic kidney disease and left ventricular hypertrophy are potent modifiers of the prognostic value of the circadian BP changes.
血压(BP)昼夜变化的预后价值是否会因伴随的危险因素和器官损害而改变尚不清楚。
我们研究了3247例临床高血压患者,这些患者在初次诊断检查期间接受了非治疗状态下的24小时动态血压监测。在平均9.9年的随访期内,292例患者发生了首次原发性结局事件(非致命性心肌梗死、非致命性中风、心血管死亡、因心力衰竭住院的复合事件),281例患者死亡。昼夜血压变化以夜间至白天收缩压比值进行分析,并纳入半参数Cox模型。
在调整年龄、性别、糖尿病、吸烟、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、血清尿酸和平均24小时收缩压后,夜间至白天收缩压比值与结局保持独立关联(风险比,1.17 [1.01 - 1.35];P = 0.041)。当将器官损害的两个标志物,即慢性肾病和左心室肥厚添加到模型中时,夜间至白天收缩压比值未能与结局保持独立关联(风险比,1.19 [0.97 - 1.31])。赤池信息准则和施瓦茨贝叶斯信息准则显示,在调整其他协变量后,夜间至白天收缩压比值:(1)与慢性肾病和左心室肥厚相比提供的信息较少,(2)并未改善慢性肾病和左心室肥厚所提供的信息。全因死亡以及使用昼夜收缩压比值类别(极端杓型、杓型、非杓型、反杓型)时的结果具有可比性。
慢性肾病和左心室肥厚是昼夜血压变化预后价值的有力调节因素。