Mundy Peter, Bullen Jenifer
Department of Learning and Mind Sciences, School of Education, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science and The MIND Institute, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 31;12:752274. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.752274. eCollection 2021.
Differences in social attention development begin to be apparent in the 6 to 12 month of development in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and theoretically reflect important elements of its neurodevelopmental endophenotype. This paper examines alternative conceptual views of these early social attention symptoms and hypotheses about the mechanisms involved in their development. One model emphasizes mechanism involved in the spontaneous allocation of attention to faces, or social orienting. Alternatively, another model emphasizes mechanisms involved in the coordination of attention with other people, or joint attention, and the socially bi-directional nature of its development. This model raises the possibility that atypical responses of children to the attention or the gaze of a social partner directed toward themselves may be as important in the development of social attention symptoms as differences in the development of social orienting. Another model holds that symptoms of social attention may be important to early development, but may not impact older individuals with ASD. The alterative model is that the social attention symptoms in infancy (social orienting and joint attention), and social cognitive symptoms in childhood and adulthood share common neurodevelopmental substrates. Therefore, differences in early social attention and later social cognition constitute a developmentally continuous axis of symptom presentation in ASD. However, symptoms in older individuals may be best measured with measures of efficiency of social attention and social cognition in social interactions rather than the accuracy of response on analog tests used in measures with younger children. Finally, a third model suggests that the social attention symptoms may not truly be a symptom of ASD. Rather, they may be best conceptualized as stemming from differences domain general attention and motivation mechanisms. The alternative argued for here that infant social attention symptoms meet all the criteria of a unique dimension of the phenotype of ASD and the bi-directional phenomena involved in social attention cannot be fully explained in terms of domain general aspects of attention development.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童在6至12个月大时,社交注意力发展的差异开始显现,从理论上讲,这反映了其神经发育内表型的重要因素。本文探讨了这些早期社交注意力症状的不同概念观点,以及关于其发展所涉及机制的假设。一种模型强调参与将注意力自发分配到面部(即社交定向)的机制。另一种模型则强调参与与他人协调注意力(即联合注意力)及其发展的社会双向性质的机制。该模型提出,儿童对社交伙伴指向自己的注意力或目光的非典型反应,在社交注意力症状的发展中可能与社交定向发展的差异同样重要。另一种模型认为,社交注意力症状可能对早期发展很重要,但可能不会影响年龄较大的ASD个体。另一种模型是,婴儿期的社交注意力症状(社交定向和联合注意力)以及儿童期和成年期的社会认知症状具有共同的神经发育基础。因此,早期社交注意力和后期社会认知的差异构成了ASD中症状表现的一个发展上连续的轴。然而,对于年龄较大个体的症状,最好通过社交互动中社交注意力和社会认知效率的测量来衡量,而不是用针对年幼儿童的模拟测试中反应的准确性来衡量。最后,第三种模型表明,社交注意力症状可能并非真正的ASD症状。相反,它们可能最好被概念化为源于一般注意力和动机机制的差异。这里所主张的另一种观点是,婴儿社交注意力症状符合ASD表型独特维度的所有标准,并且社交注意力中涉及的双向现象不能完全用注意力发展的一般领域方面来解释。