Verbeke Sarah, Padilla-Díaz Carmen María, Haesaert Geert, Steppe Kathy
Laboratory of Plant Ecology, Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Plant Envirogenetics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jan 31;13:775652. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.775652. eCollection 2022.
Pre-anthesis drought is expected to greatly increase yield losses in wheat ( L.), one of the most important crops worldwide. Most studies investigate the effects of pre-anthesis drought only at maturity. The physiology of the plant before anthesis and how it is affected during drought is less studied. Our study focused on physiological patterns in wheat plants during pre- and post-anthesis drought. To this end, we measured leaf xylem water potential, osmotic potential and water content in different plant parts at a high temporal frequency: every 3 days, three times a day. The experiment started just before booting until 2 weeks after flowering. Drought stress was induced by withholding irrigation with rewatering upon turgor loss, which occurred once before and once after anthesis. The goal was to investigate the patterns of osmotic adjustment, when it is used for protection against drought, and if the strategy changes during the phenological development of the plant. Our data gave no indication of daily osmotic adjustment, but did show a delicate control of the osmotic potential during drought in both leaves and stem. Under high drought stress, osmotic potential decreased to avoid further water loss. Before anthesis, rewatering restored leaf water potential and osmotic potential quickly. After anthesis, rewatering restored water potential in the flag leaves, but the osmotic potential in the stem and flag leaf remained low longer. Osmotic adjustment was thus maintained longer after anthesis, showing that the plants invest more energy in the osmotic adjustment after anthesis than before anthesis. We hypothesize that this is because the plants consider the developing ear after anthesis a more important carbohydrate sink than the stem, which is a carbohydrate sink before anthesis, to be used later as a reserve. Low osmotic potential in the stem allowed turgor maintenance, while the low osmotic potential in the flag leaf led to an increase in leaf turgor beyond the level of the control plants. This allowed leaf functioning under drought and assured that water was redirected to the flag leaf and not used to refill the stem storage.
抽穗前干旱预计将大幅增加小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)的产量损失,小麦是全球最重要的作物之一。大多数研究仅在成熟期调查抽穗前干旱的影响。对抽穗前植物的生理状况及其在干旱期间如何受到影响的研究较少。我们的研究聚焦于小麦植株在抽穗前和抽穗后干旱期间的生理模式。为此,我们以高时间频率测量了不同植株部位的叶片木质部水势、渗透势和含水量:每3天,每天3次。实验从孕穗期前开始,一直持续到开花后2周。通过停止灌溉诱导干旱胁迫,在膨压丧失时重新浇水,这种情况在抽穗前和抽穗后各发生一次。目的是研究渗透调节的模式、何时用于抗旱,以及该策略在植物物候发育过程中是否会发生变化。我们的数据未显示出每日渗透调节的迹象,但确实表明在干旱期间叶片和茎中的渗透势受到精细调控。在高干旱胁迫下,渗透势降低以避免进一步失水。抽穗前,重新浇水可迅速恢复叶片水势和渗透势。抽穗后,重新浇水可恢复旗叶的水势,但茎和旗叶中的渗透势在更长时间内保持较低水平。因此,抽穗后渗透调节维持的时间更长,表明植株在抽穗后比抽穗前在渗透调节上投入了更多能量。我们推测这是因为植株认为抽穗后发育中的穗是比茎更重要的碳水化合物库,茎是抽穗前的碳水化合物库,稍后将作为储备。茎中的低渗透势有助于维持膨压,而旗叶中的低渗透势导致叶片膨压高于对照植株水平。这使得叶片在干旱条件下仍能发挥功能,并确保水分被重新导向旗叶,而不是用于补充茎的储存。