Yeh Jen-Hao, Wang Wen-Lun, Lin Chih-Wen, Lee Ching-Tai, Tseng Cheng-Hao, Hsiao Po-Jen, Liu Yu-Peng, Wang Jaw-Yuan
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2022 Feb 10;15:17562848211070717. doi: 10.1177/17562848211070717. eCollection 2022.
We aimed to study the safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for colorectal polyps in patients administered periprocedural antithrombotic agents.
We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through June 2021. The primary outcomes were the rates of delayed and immediate bleeding (requiring endoscopic hemostasis). Secondary outcomes included thromboembolic events. Meta-analysis using odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was performed to compare the outcomes.
Seventeen studies, including five randomized trials, were included. Over 96% of polyps were ⩽1 cm. The pooled rates of delayed and immediate bleeding for patients receiving CSP and periprocedural antithrombotic agents were 1.6% and 10.5%, respectively. Both the delayed (OR = 4.02, 95% CI = 1.98-8.17) and immediate bleeding (OR = 5.85, 95% CI = 3.84-8.89) rates were significantly higher in patients using periprocedural antithrombotic agents than in non-users. Although both antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants increased the risk of delayed bleeding, the risks associated with the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; 2.5%) or multiple agents (3.9%) were particularly high. Compared to their counterparts, diminutive polyps and uncomplicated lesions not requiring hemoclipping were associated with lower risks of delayed bleeding (pooled estimates of 0.4% and 0.18%, respectively). Thromboembolic risk was similar among patients using and not using periprocedural antithrombotic agents.
CSP with periprocedural antiplatelet agents and warfarin may be feasible, especially for diminutive polyps. However, drug discontinuation should be considered with the use of DOACs or multiple agents which entail higher bleeding risk even with hemoclipping.
我们旨在研究在围手术期使用抗血栓药物的患者中,冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)治疗大肠息肉的安全性。
我们检索了截至2021年6月的PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库。主要结局是延迟出血和即刻出血(需要内镜止血)的发生率。次要结局包括血栓栓塞事件。使用比值比(OR)和相应的95%置信区间(CI)进行荟萃分析以比较结局。
纳入了17项研究,包括5项随机试验。超过96%的息肉直径≤1 cm。接受CSP和围手术期抗血栓药物治疗的患者延迟出血和即刻出血的合并发生率分别为1.6%和10.5%。使用围手术期抗血栓药物的患者延迟出血(OR = 4.02,95%CI = 1.98 - 8.17)和即刻出血(OR = 5.85,95%CI = 3.84 - 8.89)发生率均显著高于未使用者。尽管抗血小板药物和抗凝剂均增加了延迟出血风险,但使用直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs;2.5%)或多种药物(3.9%)相关的风险尤其高。与其他息肉相比,微小息肉和无需止血夹闭的简单病变延迟出血风险较低(合并估计值分别为0.4%和0.18%)。使用和未使用围手术期抗血栓药物的患者血栓栓塞风险相似。
围手术期使用抗血小板药物和华法林进行CSP可能是可行的,尤其是对于微小息肉。然而,使用DOACs或多种药物时应考虑停药,因为即使使用止血夹闭,这些药物也会带来更高的出血风险。