• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展和验证适用于成人急诊就诊患者的简单年龄调整客观分诊和严重程度评估量表。

Development and Validation of Simple Age-Adjusted Objectified Korean Triage and Acuity Scale for Adult Patients Visiting the Emergency Department.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2022 Mar;63(3):272-281. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.3.272.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2022.63.3.272
PMID:35184430
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8860940/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The study aimed to develop an objectified Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (OTAS) that can objectively and quickly classify severity, as well as a simple age-adjusted OTAS (S-OTAS) that reflects age and evaluate its usefulness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of all adult patients who had visited the emergency department at three teaching hospitals. Sex, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, body temperature, O saturation, and consciousness level were collected from medical records. The OTAS was developed with objective criterion and minimal OTAS level, and S-OTAS was developed by adding the age variable. For usefulness evaluation, the 30-day mortality, the rates of computed tomography scan and emergency procedures were compared between Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) and OTAS.

RESULTS

A total of 44402 patients were analyzed. For 30-day mortality, S-OTAS showed a higher area under the curve (AUC) compared to KTAS (0.751 vs. 0.812 for KTAS and S-OTAS, respectively, <0.001). Regarding the rates of emergency procedures, AUC was significantly higher in S-OTAS, compared to KTAS (0.807 vs. 0.830, for KTAS and S-OTAS, respectively, =0.013).

CONCLUSION

S-OTAS showed comparative usefulness for adult patients visiting the emergency department as a triage tool compared to KTAS.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发一种客观的韩国分诊和 acuity 量表(OTAS),以客观、快速地对严重程度进行分类,以及一种简单的年龄调整 OTAS(S-OTAS),以反映年龄并评估其有用性。

材料和方法

对三家教学医院急诊科就诊的所有成年患者进行回顾性分析。从病历中收集性别、收缩压、舒张压、脉搏率、呼吸率、体温、O 饱和度和意识水平。OTAS 是根据客观标准和最小 OTAS 水平开发的,S-OTAS 是通过添加年龄变量开发的。为了评估有用性,比较了韩国分诊和 acuity 量表(KTAS)和 OTAS 之间的 30 天死亡率、计算机断层扫描和急诊程序的发生率。

结果

共分析了 44402 例患者。对于 30 天死亡率,S-OTAS 的曲线下面积(AUC)高于 KTAS(S-OTAS 和 KTAS 分别为 0.751 和 0.812,<0.001)。关于急诊程序的发生率,S-OTAS 的 AUC 明显高于 KTAS(S-OTAS 和 KTAS 分别为 0.807 和 0.830,=0.013)。

结论

与 KTAS 相比,S-OTAS 作为一种分诊工具,对急诊科就诊的成年患者具有相当的有用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5a8/8860940/16af01569e80/ymj-63-272-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5a8/8860940/a521e2239a0c/ymj-63-272-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5a8/8860940/91aa5ebe11d2/ymj-63-272-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5a8/8860940/16af01569e80/ymj-63-272-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5a8/8860940/a521e2239a0c/ymj-63-272-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5a8/8860940/91aa5ebe11d2/ymj-63-272-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5a8/8860940/16af01569e80/ymj-63-272-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of Simple Age-Adjusted Objectified Korean Triage and Acuity Scale for Adult Patients Visiting the Emergency Department.发展和验证适用于成人急诊就诊患者的简单年龄调整客观分诊和严重程度评估量表。
Yonsei Med J. 2022 Mar;63(3):272-281. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.3.272.
2
The Korean Triage and Acuity Scale: associations with admission, disposition, mortality and length of stay in the emergency department.韩国分诊和 acuity 量表:与急诊科入院、处置、死亡率和住院时间的关系。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Jul 1;31(6):449-455. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy184.
3
Validation of the Korean Version of the Clinical Frailty Scale-Adjusted Korean Triage and Acuity Scale for Older Patients in the Emergency Department.中文译文:临床虚弱量表调整后的韩国分诊和急症严重程度量表在急诊科老年患者中的验证。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 8;60(6):955. doi: 10.3390/medicina60060955.
4
Over-triage occurs when considering the patient's pain in Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS).在考虑韩国分诊和 acuity 量表 (KTAS) 中的患者疼痛时,会出现过度分诊。
PLoS One. 2019 May 9;14(5):e0216519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216519. eCollection 2019.
5
Changes in Relative Importance of the 5-Level Triage System, Korean Triage and Acuity Scale, for the Disposition of Emergency Patients Induced by Forced Reduction in Its Level Number: a Multi-Center Registry-based Retrospective Cohort Study.5 级分诊系统、韩国分诊和 acuity 量表的相对重要性变化对其级别数量强制减少导致的急诊患者处置的影响:一项基于多中心登记的回顾性队列研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Apr 15;34(14):e114. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e114.
6
Validity of the Korean triage and acuity scale in older patients compared to the adult group.与成人组相比,韩国分诊和 acuity 量表在老年患者中的有效性。
Exp Gerontol. 2023 May;175:112136. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2023.112136. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
7
Modification and Validation of a Complaint-Oriented Emergency Department Triage System: A Multicenter Observational Study.基于投诉的急诊科分诊系统的修订与验证:一项多中心观察性研究。
Yonsei Med J. 2021 Dec;62(12):1145-1154. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.12.1145.
8
Validity of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale for predicting 30-day mortality due to severe trauma: a retrospective single-center study.韩国分诊和 acuity 量表预测严重创伤 30 天死亡率的有效性:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug;46(4):895-901. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1048-y. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
9
Triage accuracy and causes of mistriage using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale.使用韩国分诊和 acuity 量表评估分诊准确性和分诊错误的原因。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 6;14(9):e0216972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216972. eCollection 2019.
10
Reliability of Korean Triage and Acuity Scale: Interrater Agreement between Two Experienced Nurses by Real-Time Triage and Analysis of Influencing Factors to Disagreement of Triage Levels.韩文分诊与 acuity 量表的可靠性:两名经验丰富的护士通过实时分诊的组内一致性和对分歧分诊级别影响因素的分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Jul 22;34(28):e189. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e189.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Influencing Mistriage Based on the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.基于韩国分诊与 acuity 量表的误诊影响因素:一项回顾性横断面研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2025 Sep;57(5):860-873. doi: 10.1111/jnu.70033. Epub 2025 Jul 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of electronic triage decision-support on hospital admission, left without being seen and time to physician initial assessment in the emergency department.电子分诊决策支持对急诊科入院、未被接诊和医生初步评估时间的影响。
CJEM. 2021 Mar;23(2):214-218. doi: 10.1007/s43678-020-00043-1. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
2
Machine Learning and Initial Nursing Assessment-Based Triage System for Emergency Department.基于机器学习和初始护理评估的急诊科分诊系统
Healthc Inform Res. 2020 Jan;26(1):13-19. doi: 10.4258/hir.2020.26.1.13. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
3
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Korean Triage and Acuity Scale Level in Emergency Department Patients.
基于机器学习对急诊科患者韩国分诊及 acuity 量表水平的预测
Healthc Inform Res. 2019 Oct;25(4):305-312. doi: 10.4258/hir.2019.25.4.305. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
4
Interrater Reliability, Accuracy, and Triage Time Pre- and Post-implementation of a Real-Time Electronic Triage Decision-Support Tool.实时电子分诊决策支持工具实施前后的组内可靠性、准确性和分诊时间。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Apr;75(4):524-531. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.07.048. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
5
Over-triage occurs when considering the patient's pain in Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS).在考虑韩国分诊和 acuity 量表 (KTAS) 中的患者疼痛时,会出现过度分诊。
PLoS One. 2019 May 9;14(5):e0216519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216519. eCollection 2019.
6
Validity of the Japan Acuity and Triage Scale in elderly patients: A cohort study.日本 acuity 与分诊量表在老年患者中的有效性:一项队列研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;37(12):2159-2164. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
7
[Evaluation of Validity of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale].[韩国预检与 acuity 量表有效性评估] (备注:原文中“acuity”可能有误,结合语境推测可能是“Acuity Scale”即“ acuity 量表”,也可能是其他医学相关的专业词汇,但仅根据给定文本只能如此翻译)
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2019 Feb;49(1):26-35. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2019.49.1.26.
8
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes for Children During Emergency Department Triage.基于机器学习的急诊科分诊中儿童临床结局预测。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e186937. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6937.
9
Validation of deep-learning-based triage and acuity score using a large national dataset.基于深度学习的分诊和严重程度评分的验证:使用大型国家数据集。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 15;13(10):e0205836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205836. eCollection 2018.
10
Accuracy and Reliability of Emergency Department Triage Using the Emergency Severity Index: An International Multicenter Assessment.运用急诊严重指数进行急诊科分诊的准确性和可靠性:一项国际多中心评估。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 May;71(5):581-587.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.036. Epub 2017 Nov 24.