Haahtela T, Venho K, Eriksson G
Allergy. 1986 Feb;41(2):160-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1986.tb00293.x.
Thirty-nine patients with asthma requiring acute treatment were included in a randomized, double-blind, parallel study which compared the effect of enprofylline (1.0 mg/kg) and theophylline (3.0 mg/kg). The drugs were given intravenously over a period of 10 min. Peak flow (PEF), heart rate and plasma concentrations of the drugs were determined before and after the injection. Both enprofylline and theophylline significantly increased the PEF 30 min after the injection, the mean increases over the baseline values being 21% and 23%, respectively. The clinical effects assessed by the patient and the physician and the significant decreases in heart rate were similar for the two drugs. Side effects were rare. Thus, 1.0 mg/kg of enprofylline was comparable to 3.0 mg/kg of theophylline in the treatment of patients with acute asthma.
39名需要进行急性治疗的哮喘患者被纳入一项随机、双盲、平行研究,该研究比较了恩丙茶碱(1.0mg/kg)和氨茶碱(3.0mg/kg)的效果。药物在10分钟内静脉注射。在注射前后测定了峰值流速(PEF)、心率和药物的血浆浓度。注射后30分钟,恩丙茶碱和氨茶碱均显著提高了PEF,相对于基线值的平均增幅分别为21%和23%。患者和医生评估的临床效果以及心率的显著降低在两种药物中相似。副作用很少见。因此,在急性哮喘患者的治疗中,1.0mg/kg的恩丙茶碱与3.0mg/kg的氨茶碱相当。