Suppr超能文献

尿试纸条作为急诊科白蛋白尿筛查工具不可靠——一项前瞻性队列研究

Urinary Dipstick Is Not Reliable as a Screening Tool for Albuminuria in the Emergency Department-A Prospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Nielsen Christian B, Birn Henrik, Brandt Frans, Kampmann Jan D

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sydvang 1, 6400 Sonderborg, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 82, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 10;12(2):457. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020457.

Abstract

Albuminuria is a sensitive marker for renal dysfunction. Urinary dipstick tests are frequently used to screen for urinary abnormalities in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this prospective cohort study is to evaluate the usefulness of urinary dipstick testing as a screening tool for albuminuria in the ED setting and to determine the persistency of albuminuria identified in the acute setting. Urinary dipstick tests and spot urine samples were obtained simultaneously for analysis of the urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR). Participants with positive dipsticks for protein were invited for a second urinalysis four to six weeks after admission. The study included 234 patients admitted to the ED. Urinalysis was performed on 178 patients of which 46% (n = 82) had positive urinary dipstick tests for proteinuria. The sensitivity and specificity of the dipstick test were low (72.7% and 55.7% respectively) when compared to the ACR. Of the 82 patients with positive dipsticks at admission, 35 were available for follow-up. We observed a significant reduction in ACR at follow-up when compared to ACR at admission ( = 0.004). This paper concludes that urinary dipstick tests are not a reliable means to screen for albuminuria in the ED setting.

摘要

蛋白尿是肾功能不全的一个敏感指标。急诊室(ED)经常使用尿试纸条检测来筛查尿液异常。这项前瞻性队列研究的目的是评估在急诊环境中尿试纸条检测作为蛋白尿筛查工具的有效性,并确定在急性情况下检测到的蛋白尿的持续性。同时获取尿试纸条检测结果和随机尿样,以分析尿白蛋白肌酐比值(ACR)。尿试纸条检测蛋白呈阳性的参与者在入院四至六周后被邀请进行第二次尿液分析。该研究纳入了234名入住急诊室的患者。对178名患者进行了尿液分析,其中46%(n = 82)的患者尿试纸条检测蛋白尿呈阳性。与ACR相比,试纸条检测的敏感性和特异性较低(分别为72.7%和55.7%)。入院时尿试纸条检测呈阳性的82名患者中,有35名可供随访。与入院时的ACR相比,我们观察到随访时ACR显著降低(P = 0.004)。本文得出结论,在急诊环境中,尿试纸条检测不是筛查蛋白尿的可靠方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862a/8870803/b923d07d0719/diagnostics-12-00457-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验