• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 对参考服务的影响:对学术健康科学图书馆员的全国性调查。

The impact of COVID-19 on reference services: a national survey of academic health sciences librarians.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Jan 1;110(1):56-62. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1322.

DOI:10.5195/jmla.2022.1322
PMID:35210963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8830370/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of the scope and adaptive nature of reference services provided by academic health sciences librarians over a one-year period (between March 2020 and March 2021) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

In March 2021, academic health sciences librarians in the United States were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey about their experiences providing reference services during the COVID-19 pandemic. The online survey was developed, pretested, and distributed to various listservs.

RESULTS

A total of 205 academic health sciences librarians and other information professionals with health sciences liaison responsibilities in the US (N=205) responded to the online survey. The scope of reference services provided during the COVID-19 pandemic included email-based reference services (97%), virtual reference (89%), telephone (80%), text-based (33%), and in-person (31%). The most common types of COVID-related reference questions included COVID-19 treatments (53%), safety precautions (46%), vaccines (41%), and prevalence (38%). Additionally, the identification of challenging reference questions and examples of misinformation were provided by respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the survey characterize the evolving nature and scope of academic health sciences reference work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Librarians reported an increase in reference questions during the pandemic and are answering them in creative ways despite barriers (e.g., limited time and reduction in resources). There is an opportunity for librarians to continue to address COVID-related misinformation. Overall, these findings provide useful insight for library practitioners and administrators planning reference services during public health crises.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在更好地了解学术健康科学图书馆员在 COVID-19 大流行期间(2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月)一年内提供参考服务的范围和适应性。

方法

2021 年 3 月,邀请美国学术健康科学图书馆员参加一项关于他们在 COVID-19 大流行期间提供参考服务经验的匿名在线调查。在线调查是开发、预测试和分发给各种列表服务的。

结果

共有 205 名美国学术健康科学图书馆员和其他具有健康科学联络职责的信息专业人员(N=205)对在线调查做出了回应。在 COVID-19 大流行期间提供的参考服务范围包括基于电子邮件的参考服务(97%)、虚拟参考(89%)、电话(80%)、基于文本的(33%)和面对面的(31%)。最常见的 COVID 相关参考问题包括 COVID-19 治疗方法(53%)、预防措施(46%)、疫苗接种(41%)和流行率(38%)。此外,受访者还提供了有挑战性的参考问题的识别和错误信息的示例。

结论

调查结果描述了 COVID-19 大流行期间学术健康科学参考工作的不断发展的性质和范围。图书馆员报告称,大流行期间参考问题有所增加,尽管存在障碍(例如,时间有限和资源减少),但他们仍以创造性的方式回答这些问题。图书馆员有机会继续解决与 COVID 相关的错误信息。总体而言,这些发现为在公共卫生危机期间规划参考服务的图书馆员和管理人员提供了有用的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a94/8830370/fa18d8448e4c/jmla-110-1-56-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a94/8830370/fa18d8448e4c/jmla-110-1-56-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a94/8830370/fa18d8448e4c/jmla-110-1-56-g001.jpg