Zhang Qi, Chen Mifen, Wang Zhenghang, Qi Changsong, Cao Yanshuo, Zhang Junyan, Peng Zhi, Wang Xicheng, Lu Ming, Shen Lin, Li Jian
Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Bothwin Clinical Study Consultant, Shanghai, China.
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2022 Sep;21(3):e152-e161. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
Regorafenib and fruquintinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors that are recommended for refractory colorectal cancer (CRC) in China. However, to date, no head-to-head trials have been conducted to guide clinical practice.
An ambispective observational cohort study was conducted in Beijing Cancer Hospital. Patients with metastatic CRC who received regorafenib or fruquintinib were retrospectively collected between January 2018 and April 2020, and prospectively enrolled between May 2020 and February 2021. The primary outcome was time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and adverse events. An additional goal of the study was to explore the appropriate sequence of regorafenib and fruquintinib treatment.
A total of 366 patients with metastatic CRC were enrolled to receive regorafenib (n = 260) or fruquintinib (n = 106) between January 2018 and February 2021. No difference was observed for median TTF (regorafenib 2.7 months vs. fruquintinib 3.1 months, P = .200) or median OS (regorafenib 13.8 months vs. fruquintinib 11.3 months, P = .527). The propensity score analysis showed similar results for median TTF and median OS between the 2 groups, as did the results of subgroup analysis for prospective set (n = 146). For sequence analysis, patients with regorafenib followed by fruquintinib (n = 84) showed longer OS than that with the reverse (n = 29) (28.1 months vs. 18.4 months, P = .024). Most patients tolerated regorafenib at a reduced dose (93.1%), and most patients tolerated fruquintinib at a standard dose (68.9%). The incidences of most adverse events were similar between the two groups, while any grade of hand-foot skin reaction and hyperbilirubinemia were more frequently observed in the regorafenib group and ≥grade 3 hypertension was more common in the fruquintinib group.
Regorafenib and fruquintinib had similar efficacy and toxicity profiles with various frequency. Regorafenib followed by fruquintinib showed longer OS than the reverse, but the sequence needs to be further confirmed.
瑞戈非尼和呋喹替尼是酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,在中国被推荐用于难治性结直肠癌(CRC)。然而,迄今为止,尚未进行过直接比较的试验来指导临床实践。
在北京肿瘤医院进行了一项回顾性队列研究。回顾性收集2018年1月至2020年4月期间接受瑞戈非尼或呋喹替尼治疗的转移性CRC患者,并前瞻性纳入2020年5月至2021年2月期间的患者。主要结局是治疗失败时间(TTF),次要结局是总生存期(OS)和不良事件。该研究的另一个目标是探索瑞戈非尼和呋喹替尼治疗的合适顺序。
2018年1月至2021年2月期间,共有366例转移性CRC患者入组接受瑞戈非尼(n = 260)或呋喹替尼(n = 106)治疗。中位TTF(瑞戈非尼2.7个月 vs. 呋喹替尼3.1个月,P = 0.200)或中位OS(瑞戈非尼13.8个月 vs. 呋喹替尼11.3个月,P = 0.527)未观察到差异。倾向评分分析显示两组之间中位TTF和中位OS结果相似,前瞻性队列(n = 146)的亚组分析结果也是如此。对于顺序分析,先接受瑞戈非尼后接受呋喹替尼的患者(n = 84)的OS长于相反顺序的患者(n = 29)(28.1个月 vs. 18.4个月,P = 0.0