Wahler Steffen, Birkemeyer Ralf, Alexopoulos Dimitrios, Siudak Zbigniew, Müller Alfred, von der Schulenburg Johann-Matthias
St. Bernward GmbH, Friedrich-Kirsten-Straße 40, D-22391, Hamburg, Germany.
Herzklinik Ulm, Magirusstraße 40, D-89077, Ulm, Germany.
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Feb 26;12(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00362-2.
Strokes cause an estimated annual health care burden of 170 billion euros across Europe. Atrial fibrillation is one of the major risk factors for stroke and increases the individual risk 4.2-fold. But prevention with anticoagulants may reduce this risk by 70%. Screening methods are employed to detect previously undetected atrial fibrillation. Screening studies in various European countries show a high degree of undetected atrial fibrillation. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of systematic screening with a smartphone application, named Preventicus Heartbeats. It is a hands-on screening tool for use on smartphone to diagnose AF with high sensitivity and specificity.
A previously published model for calculating screening cost-effectiveness was extended to 6 European countries covering a wide range in terms of treatment costs and epidemiologic parameters.
The use of screening lowers the cost per case in countries with comparatively high levels of health care costs (Switzerland: -€75; UK: -€7). Moderate higher costs per case were observed in 4 countries (Greece: €6; Netherlands: €15). Low levels of health care costs result in less or no potential for further cost reduction (Poland: €20; Serbia: €33). In all countries considered, the model showed an increase in effectiveness measures both in the number of strokes avoided and the quality adjusted life years. The number of strokes avoided per 1000 participants ranged from 2.52 (Switzerland) to 4.44 (Poland). Quality-adjusted life-years per case gained from screening ranged from 0.0105 (Switzerland) to 0.0187 (Poland). The screening procedure dominated in two countries (Switzerland, UK). For the remaining countries, the incremental cost effectiveness ratio ranged from €489/QALY (Greece) to €2548/QALY (Serbia).
The model results showed a strong dependence of the results on the country-specific costs for stroke treatment. The use of the investigated screening method is close to cost-neutral or cost-reducing in the Western European countries and Greece. In countries with low price levels, higher cost increases due to AF screening are to be expected. Lower costs of anticoagulation, which are expected due to the upcoming patent expiry of direct anticoagulants, have a positive effect on the cost result.
据估计,中风在欧洲每年造成的医疗负担达1700亿欧元。心房颤动是中风的主要危险因素之一,会使个体风险增加4.2倍。但使用抗凝剂进行预防可将这种风险降低70%。采用筛查方法来检测此前未被发现的心房颤动。欧洲各国的筛查研究显示,存在大量未被发现的心房颤动。本研究旨在评估一款名为Preventicus Heartbeats的智能手机应用程序进行系统筛查的成本效益。它是一款用于智能手机的实用筛查工具,用于诊断心房颤动,具有高灵敏度和特异性。
一个先前发表的用于计算筛查成本效益的模型被扩展至6个欧洲国家,这些国家在治疗成本和流行病学参数方面涵盖范围广泛。
在医疗成本相对较高的国家(瑞士:-75欧元;英国:-7欧元),使用筛查可降低每个病例的成本。在4个国家(希腊:6欧元;荷兰:15欧元)观察到每个病例的成本略有增加。医疗成本较低导致进一步降低成本的潜力较小或没有(波兰:20欧元;塞尔维亚:33欧元)。在所有考虑的国家中,该模型显示在避免中风的数量和质量调整生命年这两个有效性指标上均有所增加。每1000名参与者中避免中风的数量从2.52(瑞士)到4.44(波兰)不等。通过筛查每例获得的质量调整生命年从0.0105(瑞士)到0.0187(波兰)不等。筛查程序在两个国家(瑞士、英国)占主导地位。对于其余国家,增量成本效益比从489欧元/质量调整生命年(希腊)到2548欧元/质量调整生命年(塞尔维亚)不等。
模型结果显示结果强烈依赖于各国中风治疗的特定成本。在所研究的筛查方法的使用在西欧国家和希腊接近成本中性或降低成本。在价格水平较低的国家,预计因心房颤动筛查导致的成本增加会更高。由于直接抗凝剂即将到期专利,预计抗凝成本降低,这对成本结果有积极影响。