BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Various pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies have been employed to minimise hypotension during obstetric spinal anaesthesia. We compared a prophylactic combination of glycopyrrolate, ondansetron, and ephedrine in terms of total vasopressor consumption, with standard treatment in this randomised controlled trial.

METHODS

One hundred patients undergoing elective caeserean sections were randomly divided into two groups of 50 each, the study group received prophylactic ondansetron and glycopyrrolate boluses followed by an infusion of ephedrine, while the control group received ephedrine boluses as required. The total ephedrine consumption (primary objective), incidence and degree of hypotension, heart rate variations, and neonatal APGAR scores (secondary objectives) were analysed.

RESULTS

The median ephedrine requirement was lesser in the study group compared to the control group [13.2 mg (10--15.75) vs. 27.7 mg (12--24)], with a value of 0.02. Fewer participants experienced hypotension in the study group before baby delivery compared to the control group (12 vs. 36, = 0.004). Heart rate was higher in the study group. No significant differences were observed in neonatal APGAR scores and incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

A combination of glycopyrrolate, ondansetron, and ephedrine might offer better haemodynamic stability and reduce vasopressor consumption in obstetric patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia as opposed to standard treatment.