Suppr超能文献

人工神经网络与兼容生物量模型预测单株树木地上生物量的比较

[Comparison of artificial neural network with compatible biomass model for predicting aboveground biomass of individual tree].

作者信息

Liang Rui-Ting, Wang Yi-Fu, Qiu Si-Yu, Sun Yu-Jun, Xie Yun-Hong

机构信息

State Forestry & Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resources & Environmental Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.

出版信息

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Jan;33(1):9-16. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202201.001.

Abstract

Forest biomass is an important index in forest development planning and forest resource monitoring. In order to provide a more efficient and low-biased method for estimating individual tree biomass, we introduced artificial neural network here. We used the data of aboveground biomass of 101 trees harvested from the Dongzhelenghe Forest Farm in Heilongjiang Province to develop four aggregation model systems (AMS), based on different combination of the variables (diameter at breast height, tree height, crown width). The weighted functions were used to eliminate heteroscedasticity. Then, we trained artificial neural network (ANN) biomass model based on the optimal combination. The models were tested by the leave-one-out cross-validation method to compare the accuracy of the two biomass estimation methods. The results showed that biomass model based on only one variable, diameter at breast height, could accurately estimate the biomass of . Adding two indices, tree height and crown width, could improve the fitting performance of models, with AMS4 performing the best among the four addictive model systems. The biomass models developed by the two methods both could estimate biomass at tree level accurately, with the coefficient of determination () of each component was higher than 0.87. Compared with the AMS4, of leaf biomass model was about 0.05 higher, and that of other organs were also about 0.01 higher in artificial neural network model system. In addition, the root mean square error (RMSE) and other indicators were also significantly smaller. For example, the RMSE of tree stem and aboveground biomass were smaller by 2.135 kg and 3.908 kg, respectively. The model's validation statistics mean relative error (MRE) performed better. In general, ANN was a flexible and reliable biomass estimation method, which was worthy consideration when predicting tree component biomass or aboveground biomass.

摘要

森林生物量是森林发展规划和森林资源监测中的一个重要指标。为了提供一种更高效且低偏差的单株树木生物量估计方法,我们在此引入了人工神经网络。我们使用从黑龙江省东折棱河林场采伐的101株树木的地上生物量数据,基于变量(胸径、树高、冠幅)的不同组合开发了四个聚合模型系统(AMS)。使用加权函数来消除异方差性。然后,我们基于最优组合训练了人工神经网络(ANN)生物量模型。通过留一法交叉验证方法对模型进行测试,以比较两种生物量估计方法的准确性。结果表明,仅基于一个变量胸径的生物量模型能够准确估计……的生物量。添加树高和冠幅这两个指标可以提高模型的拟合性能,在四个加法模型系统中AMS4表现最佳。两种方法开发的生物量模型都能够准确估计树木水平的生物量,各组分的决定系数()均高于0.87。与AMS4相比,人工神经网络模型系统中叶生物量模型的决定系数约高0.05,其他器官的决定系数也约高0.01。此外,均方根误差(RMSE)等指标也显著更小。例如,树干和地上生物量的RMSE分别小2.135千克和3.908千克。模型的验证统计平均相对误差(MRE)表现更好。总体而言,人工神经网络是一种灵活可靠的生物量估计方法,在预测树木组分生物量或地上生物量时值得考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验