Clinic for Swine and Small Ruminants, Forensic Medicine and Ambulatory Service, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation.
Institute for Microbiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation.
Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 2022 Feb;50(1):30-37. doi: 10.1055/a-1696-3952. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
Milk samples from clinically healthy sows often contain a similar bacterial content as samples from mastitic sows. To verify whether contamination during sample collection is a possible reason for this or bacterial content in the mammary gland postpartum is a regular finding, the aim of the present study was to compare the suitability of milk samples and mammary gland biopsies for assessing the bacteriological status of healthy sows.
Twenty-five clinically healthy sows of different parities were selected. The mammary skin and teats were cleaned and disinfected before biopsies and milk samples were taken from the second mammary gland on the left udder side one day postpartum. Needle biopsies were performed after local anaesthesia. Samples were investigated bacteriologically for aerobic bacteria and a semi-quantitative classification of bacterial growth was carried out. Additionally, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsies from 18 of the healthy sows were stained and scored for inflammatory cells.
A low bacterial content could be found in 96 % of milk samples and in 92 % of biopsies from the healthy sows. Both Gram-positive (mostly streptococci and staphylococci) and Gram-negative bacteria ( were detected. Histopathological examination revealed mild inflammatory cell infiltration with mainly plasma cells and lymphocytes, in rare cases neutrophilic granulocytes.
Biopsies of the mammary gland provided similar results with regard to bacteriological investigation compared to milk sampling although these were collected under aseptic conditions. Therefore, it is assumed that ubiquitous bacteria are regularly present in the colostrum and in the mammary gland tissue of clinically healthy sows after parturition. Histopathological findings were not entirely uneventful.
Milk samples and biopsies from the thoroughly cleaned and disinfected mammary gland indicate a regular bacterial load of the gland postpartum; biopsies do not provide advantages with regard to hygienic conditions.
来自临床健康母猪的牛奶样本通常含有与乳腺炎母猪样本相似的细菌含量。为了验证在样本采集过程中是否存在污染的可能性,或者产后乳腺中的细菌含量是否是常见现象,本研究旨在比较牛奶样本和乳腺活检在评估健康母猪的细菌状态方面的适用性。
选择了 25 头不同胎次的临床健康母猪。在进行活检和采集产后第一天左侧第二个乳腺的牛奶样本之前,对乳腺皮肤和乳头进行清洁和消毒。在局部麻醉后进行针吸活检。对样本进行需氧细菌的细菌学检查,并进行细菌生长的半定量分类。此外,对 18 头健康母猪的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋活检进行了染色和炎症细胞评分。
96%的牛奶样本和 92%的健康母猪活检中可发现低细菌含量。革兰氏阳性菌(主要是链球菌和葡萄球菌)和革兰氏阴性菌都有检测到。组织病理学检查显示,仅有少数情况下存在中性粒细胞浸润,主要为浆细胞和淋巴细胞的轻度炎症细胞浸润。
与无菌条件下采集的牛奶样本相比,乳腺活检在细菌学研究方面提供了相似的结果。因此,假设在产后,普遍存在于初乳和临床健康母猪乳腺组织中的细菌是正常的。组织病理学检查结果并非完全无异常。
彻底清洁和消毒后的乳腺采集的牛奶样本和活检表明产后乳腺的细菌负荷是正常的;活检在卫生条件方面没有提供优势。