van der Steen Wouter, van de Graaf Rob A, Chalos Vicky, Lingsma Hester F, van Doormaal Pieter Jan, Coutinho Jonathan M, Emmer Bart J, de Ridder Inger, van Zwam Wim, van der Worp H Bart, van der Schaaf Irene, Gons Rob A R, Yo Lonneke S F, Boiten Jelis, van den Wijngaard Ido, Hofmeijer Jeannette, Martens Jasper, Schonewille Wouter, Vos Jan Albert, Tuladhar Anil Man, de Laat Karlijn F, van Hasselt Boudewijn, Remmers Michel, Vos Douwe, Rozeman Anouk, Elgersma Otto, Uyttenboogaart Maarten, Bokkers Reinoud P H, van Tuijl Julia, Boukrab Issam, van den Berg René, Beenen Ludo F M, Roosendaal Stefan D, Postma Alida Annechien, Krietemeijer Menno, Lycklama Geert, Meijer Frederick J A, Hammer Sebastiaan, van der Hoorn Anouk, Yoo Albert J, Gerrits Dick, Truijman Martine T B, Zinkstok Sanne, Koudstaal Peter J, Manschot Sanne, Kerkhoff Henk, Nieboer Daan, Berkhemer Olvert, Wolff Lennard, van der Sluijs P Matthijs, van Voorst Henk, Tolhuisen Manon, Roos Yvo B W E M, Majoie Charles B L M, Staals Julie, van Oostenbrugge Robert J, Jenniskens Sjoerd F M, van Dijk Lukas C, den Hertog Heleen M, van Es Adriaan C G M, van der Lugt Aad, Dippel Diederik W J, Roozenbeek Bob
Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Lancet. 2022 Mar 12;399(10329):1059-1069. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00014-9. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
Aspirin and unfractionated heparin are often used during endovascular stroke treatment to improve reperfusion and outcomes. However, the effects and risks of anti-thrombotics for this indication are unknown. We therefore aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of intravenous aspirin, unfractionated heparin, both, or neither started during endovascular treatment in patients with ischaemic stroke.
We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial with a 2 × 3 factorial design in 15 centres in the Netherlands. We enrolled adult patients (ie, ≥18 years) with ischaemic stroke due to an intracranial large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation in whom endovascular treatment could be initiated within 6 h of symptom onset. Eligible patients had a score of 2 or more on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and a CT or MRI ruling out intracranial haemorrhage. Randomisation was done using a web-based procedure with permuted blocks and stratified by centre. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either periprocedural intravenous aspirin (300 mg bolus) or no aspirin, and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive moderate-dose unfractionated heparin (5000 IU bolus followed by 1250 IU/h for 6 h), low-dose unfractionated heparin (5000 IU bolus followed by 500 IU/h for 6 h), or no unfractionated heparin. The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was the main safety outcome. Analyses were based on intention to treat, and treatment effects were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) or common ORs, with adjustment for baseline prognostic factors. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number, ISRCTN76741621.
Between Jan 22, 2018, and Jan 27, 2021, we randomly assigned 663 patients; of whom, 628 (95%) provided deferred consent or died before consent could be asked and were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. On Feb 4, 2021, after unblinding and analysis of the data, the trial steering committee permanently stopped patient recruitment and the trial was stopped for safety concerns. The risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage was higher in patients allocated to receive aspirin than in those not receiving aspirin (43 [14%] of 310 vs 23 [7%] of 318; adjusted OR 1·95 [95% CI 1·13-3·35]) as well as in patients allocated to receive unfractionated heparin than in those not receiving unfractionated heparin (44 [13%] of 332 vs 22 [7%] of 296; 1·98 [1·14-3·46]). Both aspirin (adjusted common OR 0·91 [95% CI 0·69-1·21]) and unfractionated heparin (0·81 [0·61-1·08]) led to a non-significant shift towards worse modified Rankin Scale scores.
Periprocedural intravenous aspirin and unfractionated heparin during endovascular stroke treatment are both associated with an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage without evidence for a beneficial effect on functional outcome.
The Collaboration for New Treatments of Acute Stroke consortium, the Brain Foundation Netherlands, the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Stryker, Medtronic, Cerenovus, and the Dutch Heart Foundation.
在血管内卒中治疗期间,阿司匹林和普通肝素常用于改善再灌注及治疗效果。然而,针对该适应症使用抗栓药物的效果和风险尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在评估在缺血性卒中患者的血管内治疗期间开始使用静脉注射阿司匹林、普通肝素、两者联用或两者均不用的安全性和有效性。
我们在荷兰的15个中心进行了一项开放标签、多中心、采用2×3析因设计的随机对照试验。我们纳入了因前循环颅内大血管闭塞导致缺血性卒中的成年患者(即≥18岁),这些患者在症状发作后6小时内可开始进行血管内治疗。符合条件的患者美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分≥2分,且CT或MRI排除颅内出血。使用基于网络的程序进行随机分组,采用置换块法并按中心分层。患者被随机分配(1:1)接受围手术期静脉注射阿司匹林(300mg推注)或不接受阿司匹林,并随机分配(1:1:1)接受中等剂量普通肝素(5000IU推注,随后以1250IU/h持续6小时)、低剂量普通肝素(5000IU推注,随后以500IU/h持续6小时)或不接受普通肝素。主要结局是90天时的改良Rankin量表评分。有症状的颅内出血是主要的安全性结局。分析基于意向性治疗,治疗效果以比值比(OR)或共同OR表示,并对基线预后因素进行调整。本试验已在国际标准随机对照试验编号ISRCTN76741621注册。
在2018年1月22日至2021年1月27日期间,我们随机分配了663例患者;其中,628例(95%)提供了延迟同意或在能够询问同意之前死亡,并被纳入改良意向性治疗人群。2021年2月4日,在数据揭盲和分析后,试验指导委员会永久停止了患者招募,试验因安全问题而终止。接受阿司匹林治疗的患者发生有症状颅内出血的风险高于未接受阿司匹林治疗的患者(310例中有43例[14%] vs 318例中有23例[7%];调整后的OR为1.95[95%CI 1.13 - 3.35]),接受普通肝素治疗的患者发生有症状颅内出血的风险也高于未接受普通肝素治疗的患者(332例中有44例[13%] vs 296例中有22例[7%];1.98[1.14 - 3.46])。阿司匹林(调整后的共同OR为0.91[95%CI 0.69 - 1.21])和普通肝素(0.81[0.61 - 1.08])均导致改良Rankin量表评分有向更差方向变化的趋势,但差异无统计学意义。
在血管内卒中治疗期间,围手术期静脉注射阿司匹林和普通肝素均与有症状颅内出血风险增加相关,且没有证据表明对功能结局有有益影响。
急性卒中新治疗协作联盟、荷兰脑基金会、经济事务部、史赛克公司、美敦力公司、Cerenovus公司和荷兰心脏基金会。